Some of my new post locations

I failed to sign the new agreements with ad sense in time and also let my blog be temporarily hidden for to 
long and and can not seem to fix a technical problem so I am transferring my articles to another site.  I also wrote more than 200 articles elsewhere some many years ago which I will hopefully transfer here.  If anyone knows how to switch ad sense accounts and or reactivate an old as sense account let me know.  For this blog site a specific pair of identification numbers is listed and I can not select switch ad sense accounts and I can not log into my old as sense account using my gmail email they say it does not exist.

I am going to correct old posts and after correcting typos I will try to show the original version as posted on my old account with the date it lists as posted and the edited version above with the most recent dates.

MiscellaneousPostTransfers.blogspot.com

Some of my most controversial material I will transfer to

AgsinstReligiousRacialSupremacism.blogspot.com

I am also writing a new book at
OffensiveTheology.blogspot.com

religious labels verses religious practice another section of undermining authority book introduction

Copyright 2017 December 13

This is going to be another section of a book I am writing probably in the introduction

It is not important to me what religion someone labels themselves as but what religion they think and practice.  I am not writing this book to convert someone to a new religious label.

 I am going to make a case that if there is what some people commonly call a heaven and a hell ones admittance to heaven and hell might not determined by what religion one labels themselves as but what religion one thinks and practices not however as salvation based on what set of good deeds someone did or even what knowledge they have but their underlying attitude toward sentient individuals.

I will also make a case that interfaith marriage is not necessarily morally wrong if by interfaith one means two different individuals marrying who label the name of the religion they practice with different labels.

Additionally I will make the case that changing what religion other individuals labels themselves as should not be the primary goal of sharing one's faith.  The primary goal should be providing information that may provide opportunity for someone's underlying attitude or attitudes toward other sentient individuals to improve more easily if they should so choose.  This improvement in attitude may result in learning how to practically make decisions that are more loving based on an objective standard of love that is relativistic based on each individuals perspective including the perspective of God if such a being exists or each god if many gods exist.

I will make the case that a god may exist who communicated with individuals called prophets and that the words that this God communicated to prophets maybe found in a transmitted copied and recopied form in a book frequently called the Bible as well as possibly other books.  However I will not use the Bible alone to make this case, nor will I claim the copying process that led up to today's bible is perfect nor will i claim a canonical set of books, but I will make claim of a process taught that each individual can use to make a reasonable evaluation of alleged prophecy from God that maybe used to evaluate some writings claimed to contain prophetic words.

In light of this sense I will try to make a case based on the Bible to justify many of the points I make throughout this book but it will not be an absolute definitive proof by which a individual of finite knowledge can know the truthfulness or falsity of my claims with 100% certainty.

This book will look at things primarily through a Christian worldview, an agnostic worldview and a national anarchist worldview although not as the one and only worldview labeled as each of these religions.  For two different claims can labeled as dogmatic tenets of the Christian faith by two different individuals labeling themselves as Christian maybe contradictory.  And one tenet of one person's Christianity may actually agree with a tenet of another person's Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Statism, Anarchism or yes even Atheism.

New book I am writing entitled offensive theology undermining authority and teaching love

I am going to write a book showing how religion can be used as a polemic against the allegation that any authority of social institutions both religious and secular exists to make an otherwise good action bad or an otherwise bad action good.

This polemic is not airtight for even in the existence of a hypothetical or real deity who prescribes a objective moral value system to any sentient life in the cosmos, other sentient life may have another objective moral value system, none the less those who hold certain value systems such as a goal to destroy or enslave all other sentient life in the cosmos I will not even attempt to reason with as well as those with some other value systems quite repugnant to my own.

This book when summed up to its most important point may simply be a suggestion that religious teachings may have been inspired by a real divine being to ethically influence people not to murder or at the very least that if such a hypothetical divine being does not exist in reality that interpretation of religious texts or religious teachings may be used none the less as an ethical influence against murder instead of an unethical influence in support of murdrr although there shall be much more to my book than that.

The idea that human beings should need a divine being to tell them not to murder may seem ludicrous on face value and it is but nonetheless even if a divine being has spoken in reality or has been imagined in the mind of men to persuade mankind against murder this has not been sufficient nor has mass murder ended in so called atheist states apart from the allegedly corrupting influence of so called fairy tales of the divine.  Yet there has never been an atheist state for to believe in the state is to worship an idol of mankind's imagined creation.  An imagined creation that is none the less deadly and just as real as the bullets that are used to shoot transgressors of manufactured laws, the ultimate act of worship to an imaginary god, real human sacrifice to the imagined state itself.  In light of this every day reality the far fetched idea that mankind should contemplate a religion in order to oppose murder even though they should simply reject the idea that murder is good at face value without need for a real or imagined God to give them command not to murder may start to seem more reasonable after all.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2017 December 11
Last edited 2017 December 11
Originally created 2017 December 10