Consider this possibility. Do something that police men really appreciate like throw them a party and at that party hand out free anarchist literature and give invitations to anarchist meetings. Sincerely thank them for locking up murderers but point out that in the big picture they do more harm then good by kidnapping people for crimes that they would not use violence to stop someone for committing if they were a civilian because it would violate their conscience if they have one and that if a action is morally wrong it does not become morally right because someone claiming to represent people who never voted the representative into office claims to have made a law on behalf of constituents who disagree with said law.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 22
Tuesday, May 22, 2018
Statism is weakness entering the mind
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 22
Statism is weakness and irresponsibility entering the kind and exerting itself through the body influencing surrounding organisms to have misery and suffering.
The state is caused by a sick state of mind.
Statism is like a mental std passed from parent to child
It is like liked intestinal worms that excrete themselves into the surrounding environment duplicating misery on any who eat the spiritually unclean food
It is like a computer virus for mankind
An influenza of bad influence
A stomach bursting alien that creates more predators to hunt mankind
An all pervasive influenza of the mind vomiting bad influence more destructive to humanity as a whole than Ebola
It is like an immunodeficiency disease that halts critical thinking
Yet it is as sweet as lead retarding the next generation to savor it while tainting the previos generation of all their abilities to reproduce creativity as they imagine a magical force will take care of their problems and hallucinate a pleasant but destructive fantasy that takes away their self responsibility and excuses their violent temper tantrums
Statism is like an std fun for some to get but horrible to have
Statism is like a addictive drug that people enjoy using but are to devoid of willpower to leave its present illusion as they go back for another hit when they hear the pain of truth
It is like a loud rock concert enjoyable to the masses but producing deafness to the truth
It is like a rainbow with no pot of gold
A mirage in a desert that misdirects people away from a real source of water and directs the dehydrated to dry sand in a hot and thirsty wilderness
It is a pleasant solution for the obsessive compulsive to take away their stress through the compulsion to act on a delusion
It is the ultimate biological weapon of a sociopath terrorist one that infects the mind but needs no knowledge of chemistry to reproduce
A wolf in sheep's clothing and a razor blade in candy is the teaching of the state
It is like a siren that lures sailors to their death, an Amazon that murders those it reproduces with, a black widow spider and preying Mantis of the soul
Statism is like a vampire that reproduces by sucking out the vital essence of the mind but falls short of bringing immortality and fears the light of truth
Statism is a pyramid scheme made out of nothing good on the apex nor foundation that exploits those below and one day will collapse on those above
Statism is a pleasant lie that when embraced brings down your destruction but only after you passed it down to the next victim
Statism is weakness and irresponsibility entering the kind and exerting itself through the body influencing surrounding organisms to have misery and suffering.
The state is caused by a sick state of mind.
Statism is like a mental std passed from parent to child
It is like liked intestinal worms that excrete themselves into the surrounding environment duplicating misery on any who eat the spiritually unclean food
It is like a computer virus for mankind
An influenza of bad influence
A stomach bursting alien that creates more predators to hunt mankind
An all pervasive influenza of the mind vomiting bad influence more destructive to humanity as a whole than Ebola
It is like an immunodeficiency disease that halts critical thinking
Yet it is as sweet as lead retarding the next generation to savor it while tainting the previos generation of all their abilities to reproduce creativity as they imagine a magical force will take care of their problems and hallucinate a pleasant but destructive fantasy that takes away their self responsibility and excuses their violent temper tantrums
Statism is like an std fun for some to get but horrible to have
Statism is like a addictive drug that people enjoy using but are to devoid of willpower to leave its present illusion as they go back for another hit when they hear the pain of truth
It is like a loud rock concert enjoyable to the masses but producing deafness to the truth
It is like a rainbow with no pot of gold
A mirage in a desert that misdirects people away from a real source of water and directs the dehydrated to dry sand in a hot and thirsty wilderness
It is a pleasant solution for the obsessive compulsive to take away their stress through the compulsion to act on a delusion
It is the ultimate biological weapon of a sociopath terrorist one that infects the mind but needs no knowledge of chemistry to reproduce
A wolf in sheep's clothing and a razor blade in candy is the teaching of the state
It is like a siren that lures sailors to their death, an Amazon that murders those it reproduces with, a black widow spider and preying Mantis of the soul
Statism is like a vampire that reproduces by sucking out the vital essence of the mind but falls short of bringing immortality and fears the light of truth
Statism is a pyramid scheme made out of nothing good on the apex nor foundation that exploits those below and one day will collapse on those above
Statism is a pleasant lie that when embraced brings down your destruction but only after you passed it down to the next victim
Saturday, May 19, 2018
What I speak and write about
How people's belief in authority structures influences them to compromise their own personal moral principles whatsoever they may be
This occurs in
Government
Corporations
Religious institutions
Families
Friendships
Anywhere and in any social institution both accidentally and maliciously
How people becoming afraid to listen to new viewpoints prevents them from researching information to become free from undue influence (aka unethical influence or peer pressure)
How undue influence helps create worldwide poverty
How undue influence fuels addiction based behaviors and unhealthy lifestyle choices in response to distress
How undue influence is responsible for most violence in society
Solutions to make the world and your local community a more peaceful and prosperous place and how to live a healthier lifestyle
Ethical vs unethical ways to share religious beliefs and psychological criteria for what a cult is based on the BITE model by psychologist Steven Hassan
An easy way to get rid of people who pressure you to join religious or other groups if you are not interested but why you should hear their viewpoints anyway
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 20
This occurs in
Government
Corporations
Religious institutions
Families
Friendships
Anywhere and in any social institution both accidentally and maliciously
How people becoming afraid to listen to new viewpoints prevents them from researching information to become free from undue influence (aka unethical influence or peer pressure)
How undue influence helps create worldwide poverty
How undue influence fuels addiction based behaviors and unhealthy lifestyle choices in response to distress
How undue influence is responsible for most violence in society
Solutions to make the world and your local community a more peaceful and prosperous place and how to live a healthier lifestyle
Ethical vs unethical ways to share religious beliefs and psychological criteria for what a cult is based on the BITE model by psychologist Steven Hassan
An easy way to get rid of people who pressure you to join religious or other groups if you are not interested but why you should hear their viewpoints anyway
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 20
Friday, May 18, 2018
Money is fraud
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 18
Money is fraud that creates incentive for a lack of personal responsibility. Money can not help the poor get clean water. If you give them money but no resources that are useful they will still have problems. The only economic truths are physics and chemistry not distribution of money.
Money is a symbol but the movement of materials is a physical thing.
Money is fraud that creates incentive for a lack of personal responsibility. Money can not help the poor get clean water. If you give them money but no resources that are useful they will still have problems. The only economic truths are physics and chemistry not distribution of money.
Money is a symbol but the movement of materials is a physical thing.
The "Truth" about voting
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018
Refutation of the moral arguments against ever voting
Some anarchists argue in opposition to voting because violence is used to enforce laws fabricated into existence through voting, but this argument is problematic because voting can also be used to prevent laws from being fabricated.
If the elections were not rigged and there was a vote on whether or not to kill all humans. I would vote not to kill all humans. Imagine if the proposition to kill all humans passed by 1 vote because you did not vote.
Some might argue that you still should not vote because they do not believe in the legitimacy of the voting process and do not believe people have a moral obligation to follow policies just because people voted to enact policies. The fundamental problem with this argument however is that other people are under undue influence to compromise their moral principles based on the outcome of a vote even if the voting system is illegitimate and is merely a methodology of undue influence. This means that someone under undue influence to use violence to enforce the outcomes of voting may refrain from violence if your vote changes the outcome even if you are unable to persuade them of the moral illegitimacy of determining your behaviour in matters of using violence by the outcome of the voting process.
However if you will not get arrested it maybe more effective in some cases to hold up signs saying laws voted into existence are enforced through violence near voting booths than to actually vote, in other situations this may not be the case. In some cases doing both maybe possible but in other cases doing both maybe problematic.
Although I do not find these arguments against voting to be valid in all cases there maybe some cases where they are valid arguments if for example refraining from voting can influence people to disbelieve in the voting system.
The theoretical probability of voting making a difference
Your vote can never change a loss to a victory but can only effect tie breakers at best.
It takes a minimum of two votes to change a loss to a victory because it takes a minimum of one vote to change a loss to a stalemate and an additional vote to change a stalemate to a victory. It may take more than two votes if the difference in votes between the two options was more than one vote.
The probability that your vote will make a difference in an election in which there are only two options other than a stalemate. Where securing exactly 50% of the votes results in a stalemate and exceeding 50% of the votes or going below 50% of the votes results in the other two options is as follows.
Let k equal the number of voters excluding you who vote the only way you want out of the two possible choices
And therefore k+1 equals the number of voters including you who vote the only way you want out of those two possible choices if you vote
And let n equal the number of voters excluding you who vote
And therefore n + 1 equals the number of voters including you if you vote
p is the probability that a single random individual out of the other voters would have voted the way you would prefer out of the only two options and is assumed to be an independent probability
However if you do vote the probability that you vote for your preference of the only two choices is assumed to be 100% and not necessarily the value p
If you vote the probability of creating a stalemate through your single vote is equal to the probability that
k + 1 = (n+1)/2
Which would make
k = (n-1)/2
And also n = 2k + 1
If k is off from this number by a quantity as small as one vote or even one half a vote (half of a odd number is a fraction) then your vote would not create a stalemate
The probability that refraining from voting would change a stalemate to a loss in your disfavor is equal to the probability that voting would change a loss in your disfavor into a stalemate
If you do vote the probability that voting would change a stalemate into a victory in your favor is equal to the probability that
k = n/2
Which would make n = 2k
If k is off from this number by a quantity as small as one vote or even one half a vote (half of a odd number is a fraction) then your vote would not change a stalemate into a victory.
The probability that refraining from voting would change a victory into a stalemate is equal to the probability that voting would change a stalemate into a victory
The probability that voting would change a loss into a victory is equal to the probability that
k < (n/2)
And
k+1 > (n+1)/2
For example
If n = 5 and k = 2
Then
2 < 2.5 = 5/2
But
2 + 1 = 3 which is not greater than 3 = (5+1)/2
If n = 5 and k = 3 then there already is a victory and voting can not change a loss into a victory
So if 5 other people voted your additional vote could never ever change a loss into a victory as you can see if you try all possible natural number values of k
But what if 6 people voted
2 < 3 = 6/2
But
2 + 1 = 3 is not greater than 3 = 6/2
But if n = 6 and k = 3 you can change a stalemate to a victory but not a loss into a victory
And if n = 6 and k = 4 there already is a victory so you can not change a loss into a victory
To calculate the probability use the method (x = X) at the webpage below for calculating probability as this is a discrete probability function not a continuous function and only uses a single value of x not a range as exceeding the voting requirements by multiple votes will not change the outcome. Input the two values of k solved for above and add the probabilities to get the likelihood that your vote can change from a loss to a stalemate or a stalemate to a victory or do not add them and only select the appropriate single value of k if you are only interested in one of those cases. The lowercase letter x is equivalent to k here. You can also use the formulas in Wikipedia below remember to calculate the probabilities for the single discrete values which will give a very low value and not to use the probabilities for at least a certain number or less than a certain number of votes which would give incorrect answers that are highly inflated.
When plugging factorial into the equations.
Keep in mind 100! Is equal to 9.332622e+157
According to a Google search I just did which I do not know the accuracy of.
This means the numbers in both the numerator and denominator maybe so
large that it is difficult to know if you calculated them correctly even with a
computer due to how they often default to deal with numbers containing
a smaller number of digits.
The numbers used to calculate how unlikely these probabilities are are so large you may have difficulty calculating them.
https://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~mbognar/applets/bin.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20180518125852/https://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~mbognar/applets/bin.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution
http://web.archive.org/web/20180518130449/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution
Probability of being struck by lightning
http://web.archive.org/web/20180518145627/http://www.actualanalysis.com/llp.htm
https://citp.princeton.edu/research/voting/
https://web.archive.org/web/20180802044230/https://citp.princeton.edu/research/voting/
https://web.archive.org/web/20170825144915/https://s3.amazonaws.com/citpsite/publications/ts06full.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20170813132353/https://s3.amazonaws.com/citpsite/publications/ts06EVT.pdf
https://attackthesystem.com/2018/07/18/they-interfered-in-our-election-power-elite-crybabies/
https://web.archive.org/web/20180812224225/https://attackthesystem.com/2018/07/18/they-interfered-in-our-election-power-elite-crybabies/
https://web.archive.org/web/20180802035639/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DMw2dn6K1oI
Refutation of the moral arguments against ever voting
Some anarchists argue in opposition to voting because violence is used to enforce laws fabricated into existence through voting, but this argument is problematic because voting can also be used to prevent laws from being fabricated.
If the elections were not rigged and there was a vote on whether or not to kill all humans. I would vote not to kill all humans. Imagine if the proposition to kill all humans passed by 1 vote because you did not vote.
Some might argue that you still should not vote because they do not believe in the legitimacy of the voting process and do not believe people have a moral obligation to follow policies just because people voted to enact policies. The fundamental problem with this argument however is that other people are under undue influence to compromise their moral principles based on the outcome of a vote even if the voting system is illegitimate and is merely a methodology of undue influence. This means that someone under undue influence to use violence to enforce the outcomes of voting may refrain from violence if your vote changes the outcome even if you are unable to persuade them of the moral illegitimacy of determining your behaviour in matters of using violence by the outcome of the voting process.
However if you will not get arrested it maybe more effective in some cases to hold up signs saying laws voted into existence are enforced through violence near voting booths than to actually vote, in other situations this may not be the case. In some cases doing both maybe possible but in other cases doing both maybe problematic.
Although I do not find these arguments against voting to be valid in all cases there maybe some cases where they are valid arguments if for example refraining from voting can influence people to disbelieve in the voting system.
The theoretical probability of voting making a difference
Your vote can never change a loss to a victory but can only effect tie breakers at best.
It takes a minimum of two votes to change a loss to a victory because it takes a minimum of one vote to change a loss to a stalemate and an additional vote to change a stalemate to a victory. It may take more than two votes if the difference in votes between the two options was more than one vote.
The probability that your vote will make a difference in an election in which there are only two options other than a stalemate. Where securing exactly 50% of the votes results in a stalemate and exceeding 50% of the votes or going below 50% of the votes results in the other two options is as follows.
Let k equal the number of voters excluding you who vote the only way you want out of the two possible choices
And therefore k+1 equals the number of voters including you who vote the only way you want out of those two possible choices if you vote
And let n equal the number of voters excluding you who vote
And therefore n + 1 equals the number of voters including you if you vote
p is the probability that a single random individual out of the other voters would have voted the way you would prefer out of the only two options and is assumed to be an independent probability
However if you do vote the probability that you vote for your preference of the only two choices is assumed to be 100% and not necessarily the value p
If you vote the probability of creating a stalemate through your single vote is equal to the probability that
k + 1 = (n+1)/2
Which would make
k = (n-1)/2
And also n = 2k + 1
If k is off from this number by a quantity as small as one vote or even one half a vote (half of a odd number is a fraction) then your vote would not create a stalemate
The probability that refraining from voting would change a stalemate to a loss in your disfavor is equal to the probability that voting would change a loss in your disfavor into a stalemate
If you do vote the probability that voting would change a stalemate into a victory in your favor is equal to the probability that
k = n/2
Which would make n = 2k
If k is off from this number by a quantity as small as one vote or even one half a vote (half of a odd number is a fraction) then your vote would not change a stalemate into a victory.
The probability that refraining from voting would change a victory into a stalemate is equal to the probability that voting would change a stalemate into a victory
The probability that voting would change a loss into a victory is equal to the probability that
k < (n/2)
And
k+1 > (n+1)/2
For example
If n = 5 and k = 2
Then
2 < 2.5 = 5/2
But
2 + 1 = 3 which is not greater than 3 = (5+1)/2
If n = 5 and k = 3 then there already is a victory and voting can not change a loss into a victory
So if 5 other people voted your additional vote could never ever change a loss into a victory as you can see if you try all possible natural number values of k
But what if 6 people voted
2 < 3 = 6/2
But
2 + 1 = 3 is not greater than 3 = 6/2
But if n = 6 and k = 3 you can change a stalemate to a victory but not a loss into a victory
And if n = 6 and k = 4 there already is a victory so you can not change a loss into a victory
To calculate the probability use the method (x = X) at the webpage below for calculating probability as this is a discrete probability function not a continuous function and only uses a single value of x not a range as exceeding the voting requirements by multiple votes will not change the outcome. Input the two values of k solved for above and add the probabilities to get the likelihood that your vote can change from a loss to a stalemate or a stalemate to a victory or do not add them and only select the appropriate single value of k if you are only interested in one of those cases. The lowercase letter x is equivalent to k here. You can also use the formulas in Wikipedia below remember to calculate the probabilities for the single discrete values which will give a very low value and not to use the probabilities for at least a certain number or less than a certain number of votes which would give incorrect answers that are highly inflated.
When plugging factorial into the equations.
Keep in mind 100! Is equal to 9.332622e+157
According to a Google search I just did which I do not know the accuracy of.
This means the numbers in both the numerator and denominator maybe so
large that it is difficult to know if you calculated them correctly even with a
computer due to how they often default to deal with numbers containing
a smaller number of digits.
The numbers used to calculate how unlikely these probabilities are are so large you may have difficulty calculating them.
https://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~mbognar/applets/bin.html
http://web.archive.org/web/20180518125852/https://homepage.divms.uiowa.edu/~mbognar/applets/bin.html
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution
http://web.archive.org/web/20180518130449/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binomial_distribution
Probability of being struck by lightning
http://web.archive.org/web/20180518145627/http://www.actualanalysis.com/llp.htm
https://citp.princeton.edu/research/voting/
https://web.archive.org/web/20180802044230/https://citp.princeton.edu/research/voting/
https://web.archive.org/web/20170825144915/https://s3.amazonaws.com/citpsite/publications/ts06full.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20170813132353/https://s3.amazonaws.com/citpsite/publications/ts06EVT.pdf
https://attackthesystem.com/2018/07/18/they-interfered-in-our-election-power-elite-crybabies/
https://web.archive.org/web/20180812224225/https://attackthesystem.com/2018/07/18/they-interfered-in-our-election-power-elite-crybabies/
"Man-in-the-Middle" Remote Attack on Diebold Touch-screen Voting Machine by Argonne National Lab
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DMw2dn6K1oI
https://web.archive.org/web/20180802035639/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DMw2dn6K1oI
FOX News Exposes Princeton / Diebold Vote-Reversal Story
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8JESZiLpBLE
https://web.archive.org/web/20180802031218/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8JESZiLpBLE
Princeton University Exposes Diebold voting machine flaws
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qtARzh4RSW8
https://web.archive.org/web/20180802031127/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qtARzh4RSW8
Electronic Voting Machine hacked by Computer Scientists (AccuVote-TS)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rYnUksWt5HQ
http://web.archive.org/web/20161224081652/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYnUksWt5HQ&app=desktop
http://web.archive.org/web/20180802041824/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rYnUksWt5HQ
A Hacker Shows Us How Easy it is To Manipulate Voting Machines
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hvOKWeW_Fog
https://web.archive.org/web/20180802042919/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hvOKWeW_Fog
(why I) Don't Vote
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xqCMJhDCdMs
https://web.archive.org/web/20181119071755/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xqCMJhDCdMs
The Media's Presidential Election Night Hoax - 1 of 4
vaticancatholic.com
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nflPhNdhSXY&list=PLE4B7F2C0CA48B936&index=2&t=0s
http://web.archive.org/web/20200502054552/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nflPhNdhSXY&list=PLE4B7F2C0CA48B936&index=2&t=0s
This Hoax Affects Everyone
vaticancatholic.com
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OynCgwmD-HM
http://web.archive.org/web/20200502055108/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=OynCgwmD-HM
The intellectual dangers of religious group labels
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 18
Even if someone was 99.99999999999% sure the Quran was inspired by God it could be dangerous to think about it the Quran is true or False after a public conversion to Islam because even if the Quran does not teach to execute people who renounce Islam a large enough percentage of people who label themselves as Muslims execute people who convert to Islam via saying a prayer in front of witnesses and then later change their mind, hence that set of people who label themselves as Muslims make intellectual sincerity in studying the Quran difficult even if the Quran were true. Churches have had similar practices hundreds of years ago but rarely do anymore in developing countries. This practice also occurred in which individuals who labeled themselves as Hindus would execute other Hindus who converted to what they considered to be Christianity.
Even if someone was 99.99999999999% sure the Quran was inspired by God it could be dangerous to think about it the Quran is true or False after a public conversion to Islam because even if the Quran does not teach to execute people who renounce Islam a large enough percentage of people who label themselves as Muslims execute people who convert to Islam via saying a prayer in front of witnesses and then later change their mind, hence that set of people who label themselves as Muslims make intellectual sincerity in studying the Quran difficult even if the Quran were true. Churches have had similar practices hundreds of years ago but rarely do anymore in developing countries. This practice also occurred in which individuals who labeled themselves as Hindus would execute other Hindus who converted to what they considered to be Christianity.
Tuesday, May 15, 2018
The speed of light through a perfect vacuum is unknown
Scientists have not actually found perfect vacuums so the speed of light through a perfect vacuum is unknown and light has not been observed traveling through a perfect vacuum.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 15
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 15
Monday, May 14, 2018
Fractal Solar Panels
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 14
I was thinking about if we had no roads and used helicopter landing pads if that could be done without fuel such as gasoline or whatever helicopters use that is similar to how cars use gasoline. I then thought maybe an electric helicopter but solar power might not work on a cloudy day leading to a fall from a very high height that is much more dangerous than a solar powered car running out of fuel of course they could be electrically charged on the ground and receive additional energy through solar power.
But the weight of the solar panels might be too heavy to produce enough electricity to enable the vehicle with solar panels to fly. Then I thought the human body has a lot of parts with a very high surface area to volume ratio and fractals allegedly can have a unlimited surface area for a finite volume. Changing the shape of solar panels might enable solar panels to get more power or energy from sunlight per volume and hence more power per weight or mass given a constant density. I thought particularly about pine tree leaves because unlike human internal organs that work by diffusion of liquids the light tends to come in from a particular direction so creating extra surface area has limitations if some parts of the solar panel block other parts from receiving light in a way that is different then the way water diffuses thus requiring a different shape and being closer to cross sectional area than surface area mathematically but not necessarily exactly either one but probably a quantity in between those two types of areas based on the angle light hits the object being unable to use the extra portions of the surface area that are blocked by other parts of the panels but also having a higher area hit by light than the cross sectional area of a simpler shape of the same volume.
I then googled fractal solar panels to see if someone already came up with this idea so people would not say I stole it from a previous person's idea even though I came up with it on my own and found out other people had this idea before me. And someone else already came up with a similar idea.
https://www.zmescience.com/research/tiny-tree-fractal-silver-solar-cells-043934/
http://web.archive.org/web/20180514195748/https://www.zmescience.com/research/tiny-tree-fractal-silver-solar-cells-043934/
I was thinking about if we had no roads and used helicopter landing pads if that could be done without fuel such as gasoline or whatever helicopters use that is similar to how cars use gasoline. I then thought maybe an electric helicopter but solar power might not work on a cloudy day leading to a fall from a very high height that is much more dangerous than a solar powered car running out of fuel of course they could be electrically charged on the ground and receive additional energy through solar power.
But the weight of the solar panels might be too heavy to produce enough electricity to enable the vehicle with solar panels to fly. Then I thought the human body has a lot of parts with a very high surface area to volume ratio and fractals allegedly can have a unlimited surface area for a finite volume. Changing the shape of solar panels might enable solar panels to get more power or energy from sunlight per volume and hence more power per weight or mass given a constant density. I thought particularly about pine tree leaves because unlike human internal organs that work by diffusion of liquids the light tends to come in from a particular direction so creating extra surface area has limitations if some parts of the solar panel block other parts from receiving light in a way that is different then the way water diffuses thus requiring a different shape and being closer to cross sectional area than surface area mathematically but not necessarily exactly either one but probably a quantity in between those two types of areas based on the angle light hits the object being unable to use the extra portions of the surface area that are blocked by other parts of the panels but also having a higher area hit by light than the cross sectional area of a simpler shape of the same volume.
I then googled fractal solar panels to see if someone already came up with this idea so people would not say I stole it from a previous person's idea even though I came up with it on my own and found out other people had this idea before me. And someone else already came up with a similar idea.
https://www.zmescience.com/research/tiny-tree-fractal-silver-solar-cells-043934/
http://web.archive.org/web/20180514195748/https://www.zmescience.com/research/tiny-tree-fractal-silver-solar-cells-043934/
Friday, May 11, 2018
Self imposed judgement through taxation
Taxation is slander libel fraud theft kidnapping slavery murder and greed which is idolatry, it is the love of money and the root of some of all sorts of evil. Taxation is backbiting and gossip and judging a verdict with crooked scales, taxation is terrorism and the fear of man which is a stumbling block and a snare, taxation is heaping up bad karma for the day of retribution. Look the blood of the wage slaves you employed is crying up against you and the property you have stolen is corrupted and corroded for the day of wraith. He who lives by threat of the sword collecting false debts shall die by his violent way of life as he destroys the whole earth before him and has no where left to live he has not destroyed through corruption.
Tuesday, May 8, 2018
Without roads
Without roads who will destroy the native plant life and people's houses that were there before the roads were built.
Without roads how will we create work incentive to go to work to pay taxes to build roads?
Without roads who will create jobs for police to give traffic tickets and paramedics and car repairmen to help people in car accidents? And most importantly jobs for morticians!
Without roads how will we subsidize environmentalist jobs by destroying the environment to create roads?
What about emergencies? Helicopter landing pads and fleets of helicopters and drones would destroy less land then roads to build the infrastructure and cost the community a hospital and post office serves less resources than building and maintaining a massive amount of roads surface area. But at what cost? A loss in man hours of work.
How do you enjoy your miserable job?
How do you enjoy your miserable job?
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 9
Thursday, May 3, 2018
Wage slavery island.
Imagine an island with 100 married couples without children totalling 100 men and 100 women.
They agree to make a map of the island in which they draw 200 imaginary sections, one section for each person and two sections for each married couple.
They then create objects out of trees and call these objects tokens.
They then have children and send them to school where they teach them how to learn the knowledge they need to have jobs in the real world in order to get tokens.
Once the children reach a certain age they say now that you are done with school, you need to work hard and earn a living I can no longer let you stay here for free.
All the original 100 married couples end up renting land to the other couples children in exchange for these tokens. When the children ask how come you do not have to work to pay rent they say I already worked hard to own the land but it you purchase my land for a hundred thousand tokens you will not have to pay rent if you save up and work hard like I did. But all the tokens left on the island are up to less than a hundred thousand tokens yet there were too many for the children to count to know that.
So the parents relax while the children do all the work but are made to feel guilty for a lack of work ethic.
But the parents never had to earn the tokens they just created them and they never worked to earn the land they just claimed it belonged to them before the children were born.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 4
They agree to make a map of the island in which they draw 200 imaginary sections, one section for each person and two sections for each married couple.
They then create objects out of trees and call these objects tokens.
They then have children and send them to school where they teach them how to learn the knowledge they need to have jobs in the real world in order to get tokens.
Once the children reach a certain age they say now that you are done with school, you need to work hard and earn a living I can no longer let you stay here for free.
All the original 100 married couples end up renting land to the other couples children in exchange for these tokens. When the children ask how come you do not have to work to pay rent they say I already worked hard to own the land but it you purchase my land for a hundred thousand tokens you will not have to pay rent if you save up and work hard like I did. But all the tokens left on the island are up to less than a hundred thousand tokens yet there were too many for the children to count to know that.
So the parents relax while the children do all the work but are made to feel guilty for a lack of work ethic.
But the parents never had to earn the tokens they just created them and they never worked to earn the land they just claimed it belonged to them before the children were born.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 May 4
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Special Relativity Experiments short
Copyright Carl Janssen 2024 I do not want to delete this content or edit it to remove things but I am not going to finish it. I will copy ...
-
Straight out I do not believe in using numerology to get super powers of tell fortunes of anything like that. I do not believe it works for...
-
Turd Flinging Monkey's Political Trichotomy 1 Freedom 2 Equality 3 Stability Not everyone shares the same values in life when it comes ...
