Is crime the only way to save the world from the ongoing economic holocaust

Is crime the only way to save the world from the ongoing economic holocaust against the poor and working class

More people are killed by the undue influence of economic problems than any other cause of death.

Economic problems kill people from malnutrition

Economic problems kill people when people make bad lifestyle choices as a way to handle the stress of employment or the stress of being a spouse or child of someone who is employed and takes out their frustration of employment in you.


Economic problems kill people when they have difficulty finding time to exercise because of forced public school attendance as a child, forced employment as an adult or taking college classes in order to get employment upgrades.  Plenty of time is also wasted for those who think they own their own business or are self employed but have to deal with government regulations.

Additionally auto accidents are influenced by mandatory work attendance and state designed roads as there would be less man hours spent traveling on roads if not for going to places of employment or schools.

Additionally massive pollution is a result of forced employment and the number one source of pollution is the state department of defense where military members just do their jobs using things such as depleted uranium.

When one considers that the economic problems caused by people obeying government and corporate policies kill  far more people than homicide and suicide including police and military shooting criminals perhaps it is safer to just break laws in order to be economically self sufficient  even with the increased risk of being physically assaulted by the police and military for disobedience to their policies.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2018

Large piles of dead bodies at a Nazi concentration and death camp in Mauthausen, ...HD Stock Footage

CriticalPast 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kjj3WJFZcY0

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d8/India-famine-family-crop-420.jpg

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:India-famine-family-crop-420.jpg

https://web.archive.org/web/20180710113652/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:India-famine-family-crop-420.jpg

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Andersonvillesurvivor.jpg/351px-Andersonvillesurvivor.jpg

https://web.archive.org/web/20180708091708/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Andersonvillesurvivor.jpg

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-scheer/stuff-the-bankers-starve_b_207978.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20180710112159/https://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-scheer/stuff-the-bankers-starve_b_207978.html

https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/04/27/how-goldman-sachs-created-the-food-crisis/

https://web.archive.org/web/20180710112508/https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/04/27/how-goldman-sachs-created-the-food-crisis/

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/goldman-bankers-get-rich-betting-on-food-prices-as-millions-starve-8459207.html

How To Be a Crook

Larken Rose 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2oHbwdNcHbc

https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/2018/mar/16/cops-killed-100-times-more-americans-terrorists-did-2017/

https://web.archive.org/web/20180708092123/https://www.criminallegalnews.org/news/2018/mar/16/cops-killed-100-times-more-americans-terrorists-did-2017/


https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/top-ten-leading-causes-of-death-in-the-world.html

https://web.archive.org/web/20180708095029/https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/top-ten-leading-causes-of-death-in-the-world.html

https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2013/jun/06/malnutrition-3-million-deaths-children

https://web.archive.org/web/20180708092920/https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2013/jun/06/malnutrition-3-million-deaths-children

The Plow That Broke the Plains

PublicResourceOrg 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4_E_bKl8pmY

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Plow_That_Broke_the_Plains

https://web.archive.org/web/20180710120555/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Plow_That_Broke_the_Plains

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/1f/JohnSteinbeck_TheGrapesOfWrath.jpg

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JohnSteinbeck_TheGrapesOfWrath.jpg

https://web.archive.org/web/20180710115002/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JohnSteinbeck_TheGrapesOfWrath.jpg

How can you frighten a man whose hunger is not only in his own cramped stomach but in the wretched bellies of his children? You can't scare him – he has known a fear beyond every other. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grapes_of_Wrath

https://web.archive.org/web/20180710120129/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Grapes_of_Wrath

Some of the failure to shift to more productive agricultural products may be related to ignorance about the benefits of changing land use. A second explanation is a lack of availability of credit, caused by the high rate of failure of banks in the Plains states. Because banks failed in the Dust Bowl region at a higher rate than elsewhere, farmers could not get the credit they needed to buy capital to shift crop production.^[45] In addition, profit margins in either animals or hay were still minimal, and farmers had little incentive in the beginning to change their crops.

Patrick Allitt recounts how fellow historian Donald Worster responded to his return visit to the Dust Bowl in the mid-1970s when he revisited some of the worst afflicted counties:

Capital-intensive agribusiness had transformed the scene; deep wells into the aquifer, intensive irrigation, the use of artificial pesticides and fertilizers, and giant harvesters were creating immense crops year after year whether it rained or not. According to the farmers he interviewed, technology had provided the perfect answer to old troubles, such of the bad days would not return. In Worster's view, by contrast, the scene demonstrated that America's capitalist high-tech farmers had learned nothing. They were continuing to work in an unsustainable way, devoting far cheaper subsidized energy to growing food than the energy could give back to its ultimate consumers.^[46]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_Bowl

https://web.archive.org/web/20180710115658/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dust_Bowl

Do we really need the state to save us from violent bigots?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/46/Heart_diseccion.jpg/800px-Heart_diseccion.jpg

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Heart_diseccion.jpg

https://web.archive.org/web/20180707205507/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Heart_diseccion.jpg

We do not need the state to save us from violence.  We need to be saved from how the state effects our lifestyle choices through economic warfare.

Homicides are not even in the top 10 causes of death excluding suicide.  You should be more scared of a heart attack than people with or without weapons attacking you of any and all races, sexual orientations, genders and religions combined.

That means violence of people from one of these groups against another because of bigoted hatred is a much smaller issue than the shared economic hardships of people within all these groups.  Of course the threat of violence effects economics but people do not usually die by being murdered directly through assaults.

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/282929.php
Accessed online 2018 July 7

Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 July 7

A case for doing what other people think is legal

Free agency with a gun in the room?

Thinker Of Thoughts

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_rN_LTji9yg

You do not need to obey any laws recognized by any of the states agreed to exist by the United Nations as they are all legal fictions.  However other people believe in the legitimacy of such laws and will use violence against you if they perceive you as breaking such laws and will view you as a bad person reducing your opportunity for them to listen to you if they think you are a criminal. So I would suggest doing what other people think is legal in front of them even though there is no objective legality because of so many contradictions in legislation.  With the exception that when doing what other people perceive as legal goes against your conscience you should disobey.  But for me personally it often does not go against my conscience to do something I would normally consider unethical to reduce the chance that someone else would do a greater harm than the harm caused by doing what I would normally consider to be unethical in the absence of the threat of harm.  It is important to have an informed conscience so you do not do something you would consider unethical if your conscience was more informed.  Now as for those psychopaths and sociopaths who  do not view  harming other people as morally wrong for them to do or do not care about what is moral they should consider the possibility that harming other people might have undesirable consequences for them in the long run.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 July 7

Minty mints song thought terminating cliche and who will build the roads

Malcolm in the Middle – The Minty Mint Song

user0413

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3tDVr_cKlZA

They're cool they're fresh.
They'll clean your breath.
Minty mints are your breath's friend.

http://malcolminthemiddle.wikia.com/wiki/The_Minty_Mint_Song

https://web.archive.org/web/20180706195252/http://malcolminthemiddle.wikia.com/wiki/The_Minty_Mint_Song

Malcolm gets a crush on a girl, Alison, but has problems because he thinks too much. He enlists the help of Reese who shows him how to shut his brain off, but it has bad consequences. 

http://malcolminthemiddle.wikia.com/wiki/Stupid_Girl

https://web.archive.org/web/20180706195613/http://malcolminthemiddle.wikia.com/wiki/Stupid_Girl

This is an example of a thought terminating cliche and it maybe useful in the short run to perform more comfortably by blocking unwanted thoughts but in the long run blocking your conscious and critical thinking capacity, while ignoring or even shutting off warnings of possible danger is bad for you as you will see if you watch the whole the episode.

  When statists say, "who will build the roads" that is another example of a thought terminating cliche.  It helps them avoid feeling bad now by avoiding thinking about  the consequences of their decisions by imagining the government will fix everything and they do not need to take personal responsibility.

The full episode is currently available at daily motion at the link below, along with information about a transcendental meditation cult that uses or misuses mantras as thought terminating cliches and similar concepts from the book 1984 and elsewhere.  This topic of thought stopping through repeating a phrase is written quite extensively about in the book 

"Snapping: America's Epidemic of Sudden Personality Change " 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapping:_America's_Epidemic_of_Sudden_Personality_Change

although I do not endorse reading it unless you want to read a lot of the older books about  cult psychology just to be thorough because some of the newer books synthesized a lot of the old information from multiple books in a smaller number of pages than reading all the old resources they referenced combined.  Also I would not trust anything this book says about holograms I think they were trying to be cutting edge but from the future looking back I am skeptical.

written by Carl Janssen 2018 July 6

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6i9nce

Malcolm İn The Middle S04E04 Stupid Girl

Information on transcendental meditation cult

http://old.freedomofmind.com/Info/infoDet.php?id=234

Thought-terminating clichéEdit

Thought-terminating clichés, also known as thought-stoppers,^[16] fnords, or fighting words, are words or phrases that discourage critical thought and meaningful discussion about a given topic.^[17] They are typically short, generic truisms that offer seemingly simple answers to complex questions or that distract attention away from other lines of thought.^[17] They are often sayings that have been embedded in a culture's folk wisdom and are tempting^{[according to whom?]} to say because they sound true or good or like the right thing to say.^[16] Some examples are: "Stop thinking so much",^[18] "here we go again",^[19]and "what effect do my actions have?"^[16]

The term was popularized by psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton in his 1961 book, Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of "Brainwashing" in China.^[17] Lifton wrote, "The language of the totalist environment is characterized by the thought-terminating cliché. The most far-reaching and complex of human problems are compressed into brief, highly reductive, definitive-sounding phrases, easily memorized and easily expressed. These become the start and finish of any ideological analysis".^[20] Sometimes they are used in a deliberate attempt to shut down debate, manipulate others to think a certain way, or dismiss dissent. However, some people repeat them, even to themselves, out of habit or conditioning, or as a defense mechanism to reaffirm a confirmation bias.^[16][21]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cliché#Thought-terminating_cliché

A "mantra" (/ˈmæntrə, ˈmɑːn-, ˈmʌn-/ (Sanskrit: मन्त्र);^[2]) is a sacred utterance, a numinoussound, a syllable, word or phonemes, or group of words in Sanskrit believed by practitioners to have psychological and spiritual powers.^[3][4] Mantra meditation helps to induce an altered state of consciousness.^[5] A mantra may or may not have a syntactic structure or literal meaning.^[3][6]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantra

A slogan is a memorable motto or phrase used in a clan, political, commercial, religious, and other context as a repetitive expression of an idea or purpose, with the goal of persuading members of the public or a more defined target group.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slogan

CrimestopEdit

"Crimestop" means to rid oneself of unwanted thoughts immediately, i.e., thoughts that interfere or disagree with the ideology of the Party. This way, a person avoids committing thoughtcrime.

In the novel, we hear about crimestop through the eyes of protagonist Winston Smith:

The mind should develop a blind spot whenever a dangerous thought presented itself. The process should be automatic, instinctive. Crimestop, they called it in Newspeak.

He set to work to exercise himself in crimestop. He presented himself with propositions—'the Party says the earth is flat', 'the party says that ice is heavier than water'—and trained himself in not seeing or not understanding the arguments that contradicted them.

Orwell also describes crimestop from the perspective of Emmanuel Goldstein in the book The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism:

Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity.^[5]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thoughtcrime#Crimestop

DuckspeakEdit

Duckspeak is a Newspeak term that means "to quack like a duck" (literal meaning) or "to speak without thinking". Duckspeak can be good or "ungood" (bad) depending on who is speaking, and whether what they are saying aligns with Big Brother's ideals. To speak rubbish and lies may be "ungood", but to do so for the benefit of The Party may be good. Orwell explains in the appendix: "Ultimately it was hoped to make articulate speech issue from the larynx without involving the higher brain centres at all. This aim was frankly admitted in the Newspeak word duckspeak […]. Like various words in the B vocabulary, duckspeak was ambivalent in meaning. Provided that the opinions which were quacked out were orthodox ones, it implied nothing but praise, and when the Times referred to one of the orators of the Party as a doubleplusgood duckspeaker it was paying a warm and valued compliment."

An example of duckspeak in action is provided in chapter 9, when an Inner Party speaker is haranguing the crowd about the crimes of Eurasia when a note is passed into his hand. He never stops speaking or changes his inflection, but (according to the changed Party position) he now condemns the crimes of Eastasia, which is Oceania's new enemy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newspeak#Duckspeak

The Leader Is Good, The Leader Is Great!

Pete Kent

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U1FxfR3lg6Q