Anarcho Syndicalism Noam Chomsky style is not anarchism it is just massive taxation. Anarcho Syndicalist end game goals sound a lot to me like a worldwide government with one big vote. I agree with them that the corporate employment structure has a lot of the same ethical problems that so called anarcho capitalists object to the State doing but do not support a giant bureaucracy run by employees being the employer of all other employees by a voting structure as a solution, it sounds like slavery with extra steps to me unless being in one of their collectives is voluntary and people can choose a more individualistic approach to their life or to not be a automatic member of a collective without consent. Also I do not necessarily support their strategy of workers intentionally slowing down or sabotaging the workplace as most workers are also consumers or customers and it maybe harmful to the consumer or customer in terms of customer service just leading to more problems for other workers. If the goal of working is to produce a good or service to benefit someone it would make the world a better place to speed up production and have more free time if it does not cause additional harm to the workers, other people or the environment. Unfortunately workers who speed up are rarely rewarded with more free time and the same pay in the modern workplace.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 2
Saturday, March 2, 2019
Can you logically prove the validity of a statistical worldview without resorting to statistics tests?
Can you show that belief in probability will make one's life better without using statistics that involve probability to show that those who believe in probability have a statistically significant better life based on a statistics test for a measured outcome that invokes the assumption of a probability distribution function for a measured outcome?
That is you could for example experimentally test a claim that those who believe in probability and apply statistics that invokes probability to their life decisions have a statistically significant chance of having a higher income in their bank account than those who reject a statistical worldview using probability within an alpha value of 0.05 for a paired or unpaired and dependent or independent one tail t test. And then either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis for that test. And additionally do a statistical test to make sure each of the samples tested for the t test are both selected from normally distributed populations within an alpha value of 0.05 and either rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis that they are normally distributed on that test and in the case of failing to reject that null hypothesis concluding there was at least a 95% chance you were correct to choose to do a t test but in the case of rejecting the null hypothesis conclude that a t test would have at least a 5% chance that it was not correct to select a t test in the first place and you should have selected another test because there was at least a 5% chance that the sample for which you rejected this null hypothesis was not selected from a normally distributed population.
But would that be circular reasoning that never supports the validity of a statistical worldview in the first place without first assuming a very specific statistical worldview in order to test the claim that those who believe in such a statistical worldview are statistically significantly be more likely to have a better life outcome of the type you choose to measure and in the direction you chose to consider to be better? This would beg the question if the statistical worldview you chose to measure this was correct in the first place and additionally only give the answer you desired to support the validity of statistics for the alpha value you chose but not for a lower alpha value greater than zero but less than the alpha value you selected and it would fail to support your claim at a probability of that alpha value according to your statistical worldview you used to analyze this in the first place.
Once a event has already happened does it have a 100% chance that it would have occurred even though prior to the event happening it was assumed to have a percent chance that it would have happened less than 100% but greater than zero percent?
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 2
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes'_theorem
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://ecodevoevo.blogspot.com/2012/01/probability-does-not-exist-part-i-very.html
Bayes’ formula helps scientists assess the probability that something is true based on new data. For example, doctors can use the result of a mammogram exam, which is sometimes wrong, to assess whether they should revise their assessment that a patient has breast cancer.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190302174347/https://qz.com/1315731/the-most-important-formula-in-data-science-was-first-used-to-prove-the-existence-of-god/
That is you could for example experimentally test a claim that those who believe in probability and apply statistics that invokes probability to their life decisions have a statistically significant chance of having a higher income in their bank account than those who reject a statistical worldview using probability within an alpha value of 0.05 for a paired or unpaired and dependent or independent one tail t test. And then either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis for that test. And additionally do a statistical test to make sure each of the samples tested for the t test are both selected from normally distributed populations within an alpha value of 0.05 and either rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis that they are normally distributed on that test and in the case of failing to reject that null hypothesis concluding there was at least a 95% chance you were correct to choose to do a t test but in the case of rejecting the null hypothesis conclude that a t test would have at least a 5% chance that it was not correct to select a t test in the first place and you should have selected another test because there was at least a 5% chance that the sample for which you rejected this null hypothesis was not selected from a normally distributed population.
But would that be circular reasoning that never supports the validity of a statistical worldview in the first place without first assuming a very specific statistical worldview in order to test the claim that those who believe in such a statistical worldview are statistically significantly be more likely to have a better life outcome of the type you choose to measure and in the direction you chose to consider to be better? This would beg the question if the statistical worldview you chose to measure this was correct in the first place and additionally only give the answer you desired to support the validity of statistics for the alpha value you chose but not for a lower alpha value greater than zero but less than the alpha value you selected and it would fail to support your claim at a probability of that alpha value according to your statistical worldview you used to analyze this in the first place.
Once a event has already happened does it have a 100% chance that it would have occurred even though prior to the event happening it was assumed to have a percent chance that it would have happened less than 100% but greater than zero percent?
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 2
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes'_theorem
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://ecodevoevo.blogspot.com/2012/01/probability-does-not-exist-part-i-very.html
Bayes’ formula helps scientists assess the probability that something is true based on new data. For example, doctors can use the result of a mammogram exam, which is sometimes wrong, to assess whether they should revise their assessment that a patient has breast cancer.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190302174347/https://qz.com/1315731/the-most-important-formula-in-data-science-was-first-used-to-prove-the-existence-of-god/
Saturday, February 23, 2019
Taking a break from blogging
I am taking a break from blogging for a while until certain situations are resolved. Feel free to look at my old articles and post comments and proof reading suggestions and also do the same for my other blogs listed on this blog if you search around enough.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 February 23.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 February 23.
Thursday, February 7, 2019
electricvehiclewiki
http://www.electricvehiclewiki.com
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.electricvehiclewiki.com
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.electricvehiclewiki.com
Thursday, January 24, 2019
Make Slack not work
Libertarians should support slack but sadly many "capitalist" libertarians obsessed with the phrase, "Austrian economics" do not.
Focus on monetary economic models is a dead end if it opposes slack. How can Libertarians promote a policy of greater slack than "socialists" and "communists," to make Libertarianism attractive to working class people who are tired of 40 hour work weeks and coming home only to spend more time to prepare for work. The "market" "creating" products does not create slack during the 40 hours of employment in which someone is under the misery of working for an employer. The most devastating thing about taxes is the work you had to do under an employer to earn the money to pay the taxes, as the theft of taxes is the extra hours you worked. How then can true Libertarians argue in favor of creating employment opportunities as a strength of a free market? Is not the evil of "communism" forced employment to the State?
Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 January 24 ,
Focus on monetary economic models is a dead end if it opposes slack. How can Libertarians promote a policy of greater slack than "socialists" and "communists," to make Libertarianism attractive to working class people who are tired of 40 hour work weeks and coming home only to spend more time to prepare for work. The "market" "creating" products does not create slack during the 40 hours of employment in which someone is under the misery of working for an employer. The most devastating thing about taxes is the work you had to do under an employer to earn the money to pay the taxes, as the theft of taxes is the extra hours you worked. How then can true Libertarians argue in favor of creating employment opportunities as a strength of a free market? Is not the evil of "communism" forced employment to the State?
Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 January 24 ,
Church of the SubGenius - Slack Explained
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BbHjybg50BU
https://web.archive.org/web/20190124103235/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BbHjybg50BU
Wednesday, January 16, 2019
"He didn't belong to the secret society" - Newt Gingrich on why GOP establishment hates Trump
"He didn't belong to the secret society" - Newt Gingrich on why GOP establishment hates Trump
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dO-NA73FsW8
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dO-NA73FsW8
https://web.archive.org/web/20170111122402/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dO-NA73FsW8
https://web.archive.org/web/20190116235126/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dO-NA73FsW8
https://web.archive.org/web/*/Noworldorder.com
DNC/RNC Proves The World Is An ILLUMINATI Stage! (2016)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5KHBKl7blqo
https://web.archive.org/web/20190116235641/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5KHBKl7blqo
Tuesday, January 15, 2019
chemtrailsplanet-walt-disney-film-promotes-military-weather-weapons
https://web.archive.org/web/20141231185549/https://chemtrailsplanet.net/2014/12/26/1959-walt-disney-film-promotes-military-weather-weapons/
Monday, January 14, 2019
Your Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest
Your Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest
“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
http://web.archive.org/web/20190103154012/http://constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://constitution.org/uslaw/defunlaw.htm
Saturday, January 5, 2019
Freemason monitors
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.msana.com/secrecy.asp
https://web.archive.org/web/20190106013336/https://www.loc.gov/item/09018414/
https://web.archive.org/web/20190106013304/https://www.loc.gov/resource/dcmsiabooks.freemasonsmonito00davi/?st=gallery
https://web.archive.org/web/20190106020001/https://www.loc.gov/resource/dcmsiabooks.freemasonsmonito00davi/?sp=9&st=gallery
https://web.archive.org/web/20190106020157/https://www.loc.gov/resource/dcmsiabooks.freemasonsmonito00davi/?sp=12&st=gallery
https://cdn.loc.gov/service/gdc/dcmsiabooks/fr/ee/ma/so/ns/mo/ni/to/00/da/vi/freemasonsmonito00davi/freemasonsmonito00davi.pdf
https://cdn.loc.gov/service/gdc/dcmsiabooks/fr/ee/ma/so/ns/mo/ni/to/00/da/vi/freemasonsmonito00davi/freemasonsmonito00davi_djvu.txt
https://cdn.loc.gov/service/gdc/dcmsiabooks/fr/ee/ma/so/ns/mo/ni/to/00/da/vi/freemasonsmonito00davi/freemasonsmonito00davi_djvu.xml
https://cdn.loc.gov/service/gdc/dcmsiabooks/fr/ee/ma/so/ns/mo/ni/to/00/da/vi/freemasonsmonito00davi/freemasonsmonito00davi.epub
Webb's Masonic monitor By Thomas Smith Webb,
1771-1819.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190106021027/http://www.phoenixmasonry.org/webbs_monitor/table_of_contents.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20190106022203/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Smith_Webb
https://web.archive.org/web/20170205153913/https://books.google.com/books?id=rDAiAAAAMAAJ&dq=Freemason’s+Monitor+or+Illustrations+of+Masonry&pg=PR1&hl=en#v=onepage&q=Freemason’s%20Monitor%20or%20Illustrations%20of%20Masonry&f=false
https://web.archive.org/web/19990224121142/https://la-mason.com/stb54.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20160401033346/https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Appletons%27_Cyclopædia_of_American_Biography/Webb,_Thomas_Smith
https://web.archive.org/web/20181218235810/http://www.freemasonry.bcy.ca/biography/webb_t/thomas_webb_bio.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20190106022700/https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001064040
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015001529299;view=2up;seq=8;skin=mobile
https://web.archive.org/web20190106023928/http://archive.org/details/freemasonsmonit00webbgoog/page/n6
https://web.archive.org/web/20170324174429/https://archive.org/stream/freemasonsmonit00webbgoog/freemasonsmonit00webbgoog_djvu.txt
https://web.archive.org/web/20170402054235/https://archive.org/download/freemasonsmonit00webbgoog
https://web.archive.org/web/20190106024151/https://archive.org/download/freemasonsmonit00webbgoog/freemasonsmonit00webbgoog.gif
Forbidden bookshelf
https://web.archive.org/web/20190105172608/https://www.overdrive.com/series/forbidden-bookshelf
https://www.overdrive.com/series/forbidden-bookshelf
https://www.overdrive.com/series/forbidden-bookshelf
These 5 Censored Books Tell a History the Establishment Wants Hidden
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RcHRaxN-u5U
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=RcHRaxN-u5U
Tuesday, January 1, 2019
safesleevecases.com/pages/cell-phone-radiation-education
I do not endorse this product to protect from radiation but the inverse square law would possibly imply keeping a cell phone closer to your body makes it more dangerous.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190102033534/https://www.safesleevecases.com/pages/cell-phone-radiation-education
https://web.archive.org/web/20190102033534/https://www.safesleevecases.com/pages/cell-phone-radiation-education
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Special Relativity Experiments short
Copyright Carl Janssen 2024 I do not want to delete this content or edit it to remove things but I am not going to finish it. I will copy ...
-
Straight out I do not believe in using numerology to get super powers of tell fortunes of anything like that. I do not believe it works for...
-
Turd Flinging Monkey's Political Trichotomy 1 Freedom 2 Equality 3 Stability Not everyone shares the same values in life when it comes ...
