Friday, September 24, 2021

Most rich people advocate for reverse communism

 Most rich people support a single worldwide communist State with their words, meanwhile they intend for the taxing of the middle class to give resources to the rich instead of the poor

They pretend to advocate for communism taxing the rich to give to the poor but really advocate for reverse communism with the policies they propose taxing the poor to give to the rich by government subsidies to their corporations which create slave labour they call employment

Copyright Carl Janssen 2021 September 21

Thursday, September 16, 2021

Taxation is slow murder through prolonged slavery to pay a fraudulent debt with fictitious money

 Taxation is slow murder through prolonged slavery to pay a fraudulent debt with fictitious money


Copyright Carl Janssen 2021 September 16

Monday, March 15, 2021

Why open borders anarcho capitalism fails

 Let's say everyone on an island believes in open borders anarcho capitalism what is to stop more than twice as many statists as the islands population of anarcho capitalists from immigrating into the island while carrying weapons that they do not attack anyone with while traveling to a location within the island.  Once they have all arrived and not a moment before then they begin to impose statism on the islands inhabitants before that they do nothing to violate the non aggression principle.  Let's say they are forbidden from entering because because every part of the island is already private property then what is to stop children born on the island not owning private property and not able to homestead it(since all the land is already private property which was the only way to prevent statists from invading due to the open borders policy) from becoming default slaves of the previous generation that has a monopoly of private property


Copyright Carl Janssen 2021 March 15 


Monday, January 11, 2021

There is a higher power than society and the individual

 I am not confirming or denying the existence of a god or gods by posting this.  A lot of people who label themselves as atheists believe society is the highest power and that societal consensus could over rule or change the laws of physics and chemistry and determines reality itself.  Such knowledge would be given as example statements such as that we know ___ is true because the consensus of scientists say ___ is true which is different than saying the consensus of scientists have concluded blank is true because since blank really is true in reality there is over whelming evidence which when interpreted with proper reasoning confirms blank is true beyond the shadow of reasonable doubt and I can show you the evidence and explain the reasoning without referring to such and such scientists.  In this way society is like a mythical god to them.  Other people think that they themselves are like gods such that if they do not want something to be true or do not believe something to be true it will not effect them harmfully if they behave as though it is not true when it is really true in reality or behave as though something really is true when it is not true in reality.  The intentions of an individual are very important because they may determine their actions but the physical consequences of an action are not mitigated or changed based on someone's intention.  If someone has good intentions that will not prevent the physical harm from an action and if someone has malicious intentions that will not cause an action to be harmful in ways it would not be harmful if they did the same action with good intentions.  This does not mean I think individuals with good and bad intentions should be treated identically by society as the individual with good intentions when given proper knowledge is generally more likely to refrain from harmful actions in the future none the less that does not change the consequences of their actions they made when ill informed.  The real laws of physics and chemistry are a higher power than the consensus of society and the belief of individuals whether or not a god or gods exist.  Knowingly doing non defensive harmful actions to individuals without those individuals consent will harm the individual who performs such actions even if they are not caught and prosecuted by making the environment they exist in a worse place, however one may do good deeds or try to do good deeds without being rewarded if one lives in a society of malicious individuals who persecute people for good deeds, but in a society of sufficiently formed individuals who have good intentions good deeds will reward the individual by improving the environment they live in.

Copyright Carl Janssen January 11, 2021

Saturday, July 25, 2020

Purpose of taxes is to coerce people into employment not to pay for services

Welfare, food stamps and any other government subsidies in which money is given to people do not raise taxes.  The purpose of income taxes is to make you work more hours for an employer in order to get the same amount of money, the purpose of property tax is to coerce people who are not receiving subsidies into employment with State approved entities since property tax can only be paid in State recognized currency/money which only can be given through individuals who received State subsidies or through a series of individuals tracing back to them (individuals who received State subsidies) eventually.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2020 July 25


Image downloaded from third party forum posting
original source unknown

Saturday, June 13, 2020

Rioting is often bad

When police imprison murderers that is good but when police use violence to enforce bad laws and put people in prison who should not be in prison that is bad.  Rioters often attack random people and destroy random property which is often bad.  A society that attacks random people in riots can not be improved by replacing police with rioters that are even worse than police.  The way to improve society is to improve the state of consciousness of the members of society and arm those who have reached the highest state of consciousness with the proper tools to defend non violent people.  It is particularily important to morally educate members of the police and military.  Making rioters who are at an even lower state of consciousness than the police and military to replace them is a bad idea and often results in an increased popularity of top down leadership and the general public supporting increased police ruthlessness as preferable to the worse ruthlessness of the rioters.  If a regime is despotic it maybe preferable for armed citizens to overthrow that regime but only if they enact a rule that is less bad than the previous regime but in the case of rioters that destroy random property and attack random people it is sometimes worse than the previous state of rulership.  Although some form of anarchy in which there are no slavemasters maybe possible in an enlightened society, a society of rioters that attack random people and destroy random property has not achieved the state of consciousness neccessary for the good kind of anarchist society.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2020 June 13




Daily Caller


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo5j3UbXscQ

http://web.archive.org/web/20200613231844/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo5j3UbXscQ


Monday, May 4, 2020

Why government job training programs do not make people productive members of society

The numbers are a hypothetical example to demonstrate a point not based on tax or work history of real individuals.  This example is based on the false assumption of a balanced budget in reality money is created out of nothing in the present system and paying taxes does not actually contribute to financial payment of individuals.

I have seen ignorant people proud of their participation in government job creation programs, acting as if they are being on their way to being a productive member of society.  So I pay taxes for the government to pay them to work for a corporation or to train to work for a corporation.  This is lose lose.  I am literally working extra hours to pay them to work extra hours.  If I literally just handed them the money directly between the two of us we would work less combined hours in total and I would not work anymore extra hours.  For example if I got paid $20 an hour but was taxed $60 out of my paycheck to pay them $10 an hour I am literally working 3 extra hours to pay someone else to work 6 extra hours for a corporation that doesn't pay them anything to work because I just paid them $60 and even though I paid them $60 they do not do any work for me but for the corporation.  Together between the two of us that is 9 wasted hours.  Now if I don't get taxed and just gave them $60 to do anything they want between the two of us we only wasted 3 hours, them wasting zero hours and me wasting three hours of my time.  Now alternatively if I did not get taxed I could also pay them for $60 of work to help me instead of paying them $60 to work for a corporation in a government job training program.  These corporations are parasites and working for one at my taxpayer expense does not make you a good person.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2020 May 4


Wednesday, March 25, 2020

Vertical projectile motion from a perfect sphere rotating at constant angular velocity ignoring friction

Purpose to compare and contrast geostationary flat earther claim that object on a round spinning earth when throwing vertically and not horizontally should not land in the same place it started relative to the thrower because the earth is moving.  If the differential equations provide a certain solution than the object on a round spinning earth would land in the same place it started relative to the throwing observer due to the initial horizontal velocity of the observer caused by the rotation of the earth being identical to the initial horizontal velocity of the ball caused by the rotation of the earth from a different reference frame in which the earth is rotating and the thrower is initially moving horizontally but not initially vertically in Cartesian coordinates at the initial starting time and the thrown object is moving horizontally at the same velocity as the observer and moving vertically at it's maximum positive vertical velocity which is it's initial vertical velocity identical to a positive value of the initial speed the thrower throws the object from the throwers frame of reference.  The two reference frames share the same origin, but one reference frame is rotating relative to the other at a constant rotational velocity and air friction is ignored.  If the result shows that the object would land where the throwing observer initially threw it from in the observers frame of reference this would fail to refute the claim of a rotating spherical earth without proving a flat geostationary earth, however if the result is different by a large enough margin this would refute a spinning spherical earth without proving a flat geostationary earth.  Provided of course I set up the differential equations correctly.  The refutation or lack thereof is presuming the standard equation for calculating the force vector from gravity using the universal constant for gravitation is correct if the earth is a rotating sphere which does not necessarily logically follow but is none the less used because it is the current standard physics model which most rotating globe shaped earthers claim.

R=Radius=Radius of sphere earth

Mobject = Mass of object
MSphere = Mass of sphere earth

Xinitial = 0 for both thrower and thrown object

Yinitial = R for both thrower and object

THETAinitial=0 radians

Vxinitial = Vx0
Vx0 = Radius*dtheta/dtime

dV/dtime= -1*G*Msphere*Mobject/(Mobject*[|X|^2+|Y|^2])

dVx/dtime = -|dV/dtime|*X / (|X|^2+|Y|^2]) ^ 0.5

dVy/dtime = -|dV/dtime|* Y  / (|X|^2+|Y|^2]) ^ 0.5

dVx/dtime =-1*G*Msphere*Mobject*X/(Mobject*[|X|^2+|Y|^2]^1.5)

dVy/dtime =-1*G*Msphere*Mobject*Y/(Mobject*[|X|^2+|Y|^2]^1.5)

Vfinalobject and TIMEfinal occurs when |Xfinalobject|^2+|Yfinalobject|^2 = |R|^2 for a X value other than zero


Xfinalthrower = R*sin(Thetafinal)=R*[(timefinal-timeinitial)*(dtheta/dtime)]
And

Yfinalthrower = R-R*cos[(timefinal-timeinitial)*(dtheta/dtime)]

If
Xfinalobject=Xfinalthrower and Yfinalobject=Yfinalthrower

Or in other words the thrower and the thrown object both exist at
(R, Thetafinal) = (R, (dtheta/dtime)*(Timefinal-Timeinitial))

Then

An observer throwing an object vertically standing at Xinitial, Yinitial at TIMEinitial would observe the object landing where he stands at Xfinal, Yfinal, TIMEfinal which would be equivalent to R, THETAfinal

Which would mean from the throwers point of view throwing an object vertically (and not horizontally) while standing on a rotating sphere would result in the object landing in the same place it is thrown from failing to refute a rotating spherical earth.

Else if


XfinalObject does not equal Xfinalthrower or if Yfinal object does not equal Yfinalthrower

Then

if the difference is large enough this would not fail to refute a rotating spherical earth



Now for a simplification by rounding which might not hold correctly you can use

dVx/dtime =-1*g*|X|/([|X|^2+|Y|^2]^0.5)

dVy/dtime =-1*g*|Y|/([|X|^2+|Y|^2]^0.5)




If you wish to round further yet the following can be used however it will result in a different position between the thrower's final position and the landed thrown object 's final position none the less if the difference is small enough a strong case can be made for failure to refute a rounded globe earth.

Of course this rounding results in the typical equations for a thrown projectile from a flat surface onto the same flat surface without the direction or magnitude of forces from gravity changing possibly because physicists assume a flat earth model when simplifying projectile problems although they actually believe in a round earth and this is not necessarily contradictory because the difference over small distances is presumed negligible.  Some of these rounded points might not actually exist on the Sphere but could be very close to points on the Sphere.

only do rounding for small enough values of (tfinal-tinitial)

dVx/dtime = 0

dVy/dtime = - 1 * g

Xfinalthrower= Radius*sin[(dtheta/dtime)*(Timefinal-Timeinitial)]

Yfinalthrower = Radius*cos[(dtheta/dtime)*(Timefinal-Timeinitial)]

Vy0 = Vyinitial

Vx0 = Radius*dtheta/dtime

Rounded Timefinal-timeinitial=2*|Vy0/g|

Rounded Xfinalobject =  Rounded (Timefinal-timeinitial) * Vx0
Rounded Xfinalobject = 2*|Vy0/g|* Vx0

Rounded Xfinalobject = 2*|Vy0/g|* Radius*dtheta/dtime

rounded Xfinalthrower= Radius*sin[(dtheta/dtime)*(2*|Vy0/g|)]

Xfinalthrower / Xfinalobject =
= (sin[(dtheta/dtime)*(2*|Vy0/g|)])/[(dtheta/dtime)*(2*|Vy0/g|)]

Limit as theta approaches 0+ of (sin[theta]) / theta is 1-

Limit as Vy0 approaches 0+ of Rounded Xfinalthrower/RoundedXfinalobject is 1-

For small values of Vy0
Rounded Xfinalthrower is approximately equal to rounded Xfinalobject

Conclusion
When throwing objects vertically for small enough vertical heights with a small enough duration of time between throwing and landing a rotating earth should have approximately the same results as a stationary earth and a flat earth approximately the same results as a globe shaped earth.  There is a failure to refute the round earth claim with rounded simplified equations, failure to refute a round rotating earth does not refute a flat geostationary earth.  Perhaps if the differential equations were used without rounding the object might not be calculated to land in the same place but typically physicists round so much that a flat earth and round earth produce the same results with projectile motion for objects thrown over short distances for a short period of time.


Copyright Carl Janssen 2020 March 26


Arbitrary dates and stories imagined by evolutionists and creationists

People who believe in creation origins or evolutionary origins both make up different stories, neither produced practical knowledge for the current time period.  Even if you could produce a new species by breeding and such evolution was proved to happen in the present that would not prove that the previous species came about by evolution instead of being created in such a way that they could evolve into new species.  There are multiple potential pasts that could lead to the same present.  Any timeline imagined through extrapolation could be imagined to start at a earlier or later point and lead up to the same present set of conditions from that starting point.  If you must extrapolate back past thousands of years than you must extrapolate back past billions or trillions or any number of years no matter how long to mathematically "approach the infinite" and not towards a big bang a finite number of years ago.  To say that the laws of physics were different before the big bang billions of years without observing different laws of physics is no less absurd than to say the laws of physics were different thousands of years ago as a result of creation without observing different laws of physucs.  Life could very well always existed eternally and never came from non life.  There very well could be an eternal universe without a big bang.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2020 March 25

Friday, March 20, 2020

Early Masonic Manuscripts Freemasons Freemasonry free mason masons

http://web.archive.org/web/20200318043530/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Masonic_manuscripts

http://web.archive.org/web/20200318060424/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahiman_Rezon


http://web.archive.org/web/20200318055229/http://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/regius.html

http://web.archive.org/web/20200318055406/https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Matthew_Cooke_Manuscript

http://web.archive.org/web/20200318061311/https://www.sacred-texts.com/mas/gar/index.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20200318062102/http://www.themasonictrowel.com/Articles/Manuscripts/manuscripts/edinburgh_register_house_ms_1696.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20200318061918/https://archive.org/stream/EdinburghRegisterHouseMS1696/Edinburgh%20Register%20House%20MS%201696_djvu.txt

http://web.archive.org/web/20200318061905/http://theoldcharges.com/chapter-21.html

http://web.archive.org/web/20200321053541/http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Freemasonry#Anderson's_Constitutions

http://web.archive.org/web/20200318043336/http://freemasoninformation.com/masonic-education/books/andersons-constitutions-of-1723/amp/


Construction workers build houses not landlords

Government does not build the roads construction workers do
Landlords do not build the houses construction workers do
Landlords do not help the construction workers financially they charge them rent to live in houses built by construction workers
 bankers loan the landlords to pay the construction workers
Bankers don't loan the landlords with money they earned they create money by ledger entry

Copyright Carl Janssen 2020 March 20

Special Relativity Experiments short

 Copyright Carl Janssen 2024 I do not want to delete this content or edit it to remove things but I am not going to finish it.  I will copy ...