You can not see satellites without equipment

There are pictures online of a star that can be viewed in such a manner that it must be in front of the moon and not behind the moon if the moon is an opaque sphere like object that does not change shape during different stages such as new moon, crescent, half moon, gibbous and full moon.

People have claimed those are not pictures of a star but a satellite.  However, others might have claimed such pictures existed in artwork, religious symbols, photographs and or astronomers' notes prior to the launching of satellites.

If such a star can be seen without a telescope  then this is problematic for the mainstream narrative because satellite are too small to see without a telescope according to mainstream narrative data.  Without a telescope or equivelent magnification such as a zoom feature common in modern electronics that is

This could mean one of several possibilities that all contradict the mainstream narrative

That the sections of the moon you do not see really are not there during certain stages of the moon.

That those sections are there but switch from opaque to transparent during certain stages.  

That stars or non man made luminaries can exist in front of the moon

That satellites existed were made before we were told they were made, possibly from alien or earlier human societies

That the moon is not a solid opaque or reflective object but instead generates it's own light

Satellites are lower or bigger than we are told or the human eye can see smaller angles than we are told

I will show that satellites would be too small an angle to be seen without telescopes for their longest dimension and distance.  I will do this using the largest dimension listed instead of using the pythagorean theoreom and tsking the square root of the longest dimension squared plus the second longest dimension squared.  At most this will result in that the length I list should actually be multiplied by the square root of 2 which is between 1.4 and 1.5 but even doing so these objects should not be seen

I will assume the longest straight length of any satellite can be treated as a arclength with rounding to get a close enough result for these purposes

Arc Length / Radius = Angle in radians

2 Pi radians = 360 degrees

I will assume any satellite less than 0.0003 radians can not be seen by the naked human eye without equipment

The resolving power of the human eye is 0.0003 of a radian

http://web.archive.org/web/20150113004721/https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/smallest-visible-object/

http://web.archive.org/web/20220613132429/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low_Earth_orbit

Copyright Carl Janssen 2022 September 20