https://theconversation.com/i-watched-an-entire-flat-earth-convention-for-my-research-heres-what-i-learnt-95887.
http://web.archive.org/web/20180609061936/https://theconversation.com/i-watched-an-entire-flat-earth-convention-for-my-research-heres-what-i-learnt-95887
Friday, June 8, 2018
September 11 numerology conspiracy theories
Straight out I do not believe in using numerology to get super powers of tell fortunes of anything like that. I do not believe it works for such purposes in real life. But I know other people believe in it and their belief effects their actions. I also know some people use numbers to communicate certain coded messages as a language or for symbolism. No number has any intrinsic symbolic meaning to it but people assign meanings to the numbers based on whatever code or language they choose which maybe influenced by the surrounding culture.
I do not know who did the September 11 attack and if it was a false flag attack or terrorists who were not sponsored by the United States CIA or Israel, etc.
But I do know that it causes far less deaths every day than those caused by improper nutrition and is not a real threat as a one time event compared with daily improper nutrition from economic terrorism. So it should not be significant but the media corporations and politicians used this trivial event compared to nutrition as an excuse for further control over civilians in the false pretense of safety this increased domination of civilians had resulted in far more murders than the September 11 attacks and all other terrorist attacks in the United States combined since then.
Now when I first heard the September 11 destruction of the world trade center I thought it was a very strange coincidence that it is called nine eleven or nine one one the very same emergency number United States civilians use to contact the police for alleged safety and yet misperception of the seriousness of the event has caused Americans to allow themselves to be dominated by police in exchange for a false sense of security that actually puts them in greater danger. I initially wondered if the terrorists chose that date because of a play on the association of the number nine eleven with emergency as a evil joke but now I wonder if it is to create a mental association with the number previously associated with emergencies as a technique involving association to make people feel need the for more power to police to dominate people as an emergency service if it is a false flag which I do not know.
I do not know who did the September 11 attack and if it was a false flag attack or terrorists who were not sponsored by the United States CIA or Israel, etc.
But I do know that it causes far less deaths every day than those caused by improper nutrition and is not a real threat as a one time event compared with daily improper nutrition from economic terrorism. So it should not be significant but the media corporations and politicians used this trivial event compared to nutrition as an excuse for further control over civilians in the false pretense of safety this increased domination of civilians had resulted in far more murders than the September 11 attacks and all other terrorist attacks in the United States combined since then.
Now when I first heard the September 11 destruction of the world trade center I thought it was a very strange coincidence that it is called nine eleven or nine one one the very same emergency number United States civilians use to contact the police for alleged safety and yet misperception of the seriousness of the event has caused Americans to allow themselves to be dominated by police in exchange for a false sense of security that actually puts them in greater danger. I initially wondered if the terrorists chose that date because of a play on the association of the number nine eleven with emergency as a evil joke but now I wonder if it is to create a mental association with the number previously associated with emergencies as a technique involving association to make people feel need the for more power to police to dominate people as an emergency service if it is a false flag which I do not know.
Thursday, June 7, 2018
If there was a real war on terror
If there was a real war on terror the terrorists you would have to watch out for would hide in plain sight without weapons as bankers and they would create decoy terrorists with weapons to distract you from the most dangerous form of terrorism death through manufactured poverty
Copyright 2018 June 7
Copyright 2018 June 7
From anti popes to anti presidents
I am creating a new word called anti president referring to someone who people really believed won the election for president based on the word anti pope.
An antipope (Latin: antipapa) is a person who, in opposition to the one who is generally seen as the legitimately elected Pope, makes a significantly accepted competing claim to be the Pope,[1] the Bishop of Rome and leader of the Catholic Church. At times between the 3rd and mid-15th century, antipopes were supported by a fairly significant faction of religious cardinals and secular or anti-religious monarchs and kingdoms. Persons who claim to be pope, but have few followers, such as the modern sedevacantist antipopes, are not classified with the historical antipopes.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antipope
http://web.archive.org/web/20180607184727/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antipope
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
http://web.archive.org/web/20180607185143/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeachment_of_Bill_Clinton
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations
http://web.archive.org/web/20180607185306/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Clinton_sexual_misconduct_allegations
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_v._Gore#Accusation_of_partisanship_or_conflict_of_interest
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Community_Organizations_for_Reform_Now#Controversies
http://web.archive.org/web/20180607190831/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_of_Community_Organizations_for_Reform_Now
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_impersonation_(United_States)#Allegations_of_voter_fraud_in_the_2016_Presidential_election
http://web.archive.org/web/20180607191213/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_impersonation_(United_States)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_impersonation_(United_States)#Old_Dominion_University_study_(2014)
http://web.archive.org/web/20180607191213/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_impersonation_(United_States)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_My_Presidents_Day
http://web.archive.org/web/20180607191646/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_My_Presidents_Day
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders
http://web.archive.org/web/20180607191816/https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/11/donna-brazile-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders
https://www.npr.org/2012/02/14/146827471/study-1-8-million-dead-people-still-registered-to-vote
http://web.archive.org/web/20180607192504/https://www.npr.org/2012/02/14/146827471/study-1-8-million-dead-people-still-registered-to-vote
Written by Carl Janssen 2018 June 7
The forbidden fruit is similar to fiat money
The forbidden fruit in Genesis 3 is similar to fiat money
It brought needless work and death into the world when people disobeyed good moral principles by following a lie. They were given everything else someone (God) created as a gift except for the fruit of a single tree not to eat and they misused someone else's property without their permission in the way they expressly were forbidden not merely taking it but also eating it. This could be viewed as an act of theft or vandalism, an act of taxation. Our of their covetous desire for one thing that should not be theirs in that manner they damaged the whole world like people today damage the environment in exchange for money. More over like the quest for money ruins the lives of people's children they made future generations suffer in eating the forbidden fruit. They were in a world of supply without limit but by eating the fruit they entered an environment of scarcity just as the choice to use money as a collective society brings people into a state of artificial scarcity.
It brought needless work and death into the world when people disobeyed good moral principles by following a lie. They were given everything else someone (God) created as a gift except for the fruit of a single tree not to eat and they misused someone else's property without their permission in the way they expressly were forbidden not merely taking it but also eating it. This could be viewed as an act of theft or vandalism, an act of taxation. Our of their covetous desire for one thing that should not be theirs in that manner they damaged the whole world like people today damage the environment in exchange for money. More over like the quest for money ruins the lives of people's children they made future generations suffer in eating the forbidden fruit. They were in a world of supply without limit but by eating the fruit they entered an environment of scarcity just as the choice to use money as a collective society brings people into a state of artificial scarcity.
Tuesday, June 5, 2018
Borders of entry vs borders of exit
Borders of entry are good but borders of exit are usually bad. I support the right to voluntary association also known as voluntary integration and voluntary refusal of association (aka voluntary segregation.) Borders of entry allow refusal of association but borders of exit prevent refusal of association.
An exception in which I approve of borders of exit is imprisoning murderers or other people who pose a risk of violence but not for a State imprisoning people who committed victimless crimes.
A border of exit might be refusing to allow Americans to exit America or Mexicans to exit Mexico but a border of entry might forbid some Mexicans from entering America or some Americans from entering Mexico.
I do not recognize State borders as legitimate as I do not recognize the legitimacy of states but I recognize the legitimacy of borders for voluntary communities. However since States do not allow voluntary communities to achieve borders I temporarily support state borders of entry as a means to keep violent people or those with infectious diseases out if this is the only means a voluntary community existing within a state can use to keep people out of their community.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 June 5
An exception in which I approve of borders of exit is imprisoning murderers or other people who pose a risk of violence but not for a State imprisoning people who committed victimless crimes.
A border of exit might be refusing to allow Americans to exit America or Mexicans to exit Mexico but a border of entry might forbid some Mexicans from entering America or some Americans from entering Mexico.
I do not recognize State borders as legitimate as I do not recognize the legitimacy of states but I recognize the legitimacy of borders for voluntary communities. However since States do not allow voluntary communities to achieve borders I temporarily support state borders of entry as a means to keep violent people or those with infectious diseases out if this is the only means a voluntary community existing within a state can use to keep people out of their community.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 June 5
Lauren Southern vs Larken Rose - Open Borders
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eCv1glJx5b4
https://web.archive.org/web/20181027052518/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=eCv1glJx5b4
Job creation is wealth production inefficiency
Fiat money is not useful wealth.
Useful wealth is objects that have a intended practical use other than barter, which will be called wealth for short.
Fiat money are objects that are exchanged for barter but have no other intended practical use and also are used as objects of barter due to threats of violence or deception such as for example property tax in which only a particular type of currency is accepted for payment.
As technology advances it takes less hours to produce the same amount of wealth, people also need a lower number of calories to produce the same amount of wealth if the amount of work required to produce the same amount of wealth decreases. Wealth is produced (or technically transformed) through chemical and physical changes of objects that already exist and the transportation of said objects and is not produced and never can be produced by the perceived value of fiat money. That is a $20 bill with approximately the same mass and percentage of chemical elements as a $1 bill can not produce 20 times as much wealth as a $1 bill however it can be used to persuade those who are deceived or under duress into exchanging 20 times as many objects that would normally be exchanged for a $1 bill but this is simply due to psychological undue influence.
How fiat money is transferred is irrelevant because it is not useful wealth but job creation is often argued as necessary for people to have enough fiat money to get wealth but this is deceitful as wealth is produced through physical and chemical changes. Having fiat money paid through employment is a red herring that creates extra work hours to produce the same amount of wealth through needless bureaucracy monitoring red herrings. Fiat money is also an artificial barrier to progress because people have the delusion that tasks are not possible to start without it even though all you need is the raw material and tools to do a task even if you have no fiat money. Furthermore the amount of fiat money in circulation can never be increased or decreased through employment but only through imaginary belief and printing or computer generating fiat money. This is because paying a fiat dollar to one person results in losing it from another person. The fiat dollars are not real wealth and no matter how arranged can never improve the standard of living except by being disbelieved in.
This generally means that an improvement in the management of society results in a decrease in hours of employment added together among all individuals within a society in order to achieve the same standard of living because people are able to produce more wealth per hour and use the wealth they do have more effectively to achieve the same goals, in addition to needing a reduced nutritional intake to accomplish the same amount of wealth production. Unfortunately people have it backwards thinking that increased fiat money through increased hours of employment is necessary to improve society as I already refuted.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018
Useful wealth is objects that have a intended practical use other than barter, which will be called wealth for short.
Fiat money are objects that are exchanged for barter but have no other intended practical use and also are used as objects of barter due to threats of violence or deception such as for example property tax in which only a particular type of currency is accepted for payment.
As technology advances it takes less hours to produce the same amount of wealth, people also need a lower number of calories to produce the same amount of wealth if the amount of work required to produce the same amount of wealth decreases. Wealth is produced (or technically transformed) through chemical and physical changes of objects that already exist and the transportation of said objects and is not produced and never can be produced by the perceived value of fiat money. That is a $20 bill with approximately the same mass and percentage of chemical elements as a $1 bill can not produce 20 times as much wealth as a $1 bill however it can be used to persuade those who are deceived or under duress into exchanging 20 times as many objects that would normally be exchanged for a $1 bill but this is simply due to psychological undue influence.
How fiat money is transferred is irrelevant because it is not useful wealth but job creation is often argued as necessary for people to have enough fiat money to get wealth but this is deceitful as wealth is produced through physical and chemical changes. Having fiat money paid through employment is a red herring that creates extra work hours to produce the same amount of wealth through needless bureaucracy monitoring red herrings. Fiat money is also an artificial barrier to progress because people have the delusion that tasks are not possible to start without it even though all you need is the raw material and tools to do a task even if you have no fiat money. Furthermore the amount of fiat money in circulation can never be increased or decreased through employment but only through imaginary belief and printing or computer generating fiat money. This is because paying a fiat dollar to one person results in losing it from another person. The fiat dollars are not real wealth and no matter how arranged can never improve the standard of living except by being disbelieved in.
This generally means that an improvement in the management of society results in a decrease in hours of employment added together among all individuals within a society in order to achieve the same standard of living because people are able to produce more wealth per hour and use the wealth they do have more effectively to achieve the same goals, in addition to needing a reduced nutritional intake to accomplish the same amount of wealth production. Unfortunately people have it backwards thinking that increased fiat money through increased hours of employment is necessary to improve society as I already refuted.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018
Make America great for the first time
We do not need to make America great again we need to make Americans better in fact so good they do not believe in the United States at all but just love good and hate evil on an individual level with collective results and they do not even care who the President is because they do not blindly follow orders but only follow orders they think are good suggestions based on a personal examination of a self educated conscious.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 June 5
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 June 5
Is trump too powerful or does the presidency even exist?
Clinton, Bush and Obama have all been given credit by popular culture and the media as creating laws such as even naming them after the President in the example of Obama care but the office of the President has never been supposed to create laws according to the constitution. People accuse trump of trying to have too much power or having too much power but it did not start with trump and has been getting worse with every president since at least Ronald Reagan who got away with quite a lot he was not supposed to. No politician has ever represented me they are not my president, the office of the President is a fraud and always has been a fraud no one can represent someone while proposing things contradictory to what they represent and I never signed the constitution. It is no treason to say the constitution is of no authority read Lysander Spooner. Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 June 5
Monday, June 4, 2018
Supply and demand and the broken window fallacy
https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/modern-world-history-1918-to-1980/america-1918-1939/farmers-and-the-new-deal/or
Producing less can increase the cost of each item with supply and demand theory
Although people had enough food to eat since they were tricked or coerced into using money people destroyed crops for more state issued money paid by the state
This may create the illusion of helping both the farmers who got paid money to destroy their crops and the farmers who got paid more for their crops due to artificial scarcity but it actually helps people no more than destroying a window to create a job
Job creation programs are inherently bad because extra unnecessary work hours can only be formed by creating problems that did not exist before
Extra necessary work hours will be done for survival or improvement of standard of living with or without pay incentive unless a mental barrier is created that the task is physically impossible to do without money which simply can not be true as money is used to persuade people to do tasks not as a material required to create something like making a sandwich or house out of one dollar bills, nor are one dollar bills designed as a optimal fuel to transfer energy in order to complete a task even though they can burn.
Money can be an incentive not to do useful work and to waste time doing unnecessary work however if you are coerced or deceived into using money through state fees.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window
http://web.archive.org/web/20180604213800/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window
Producing less can increase the cost of each item with supply and demand theory
Although people had enough food to eat since they were tricked or coerced into using money people destroyed crops for more state issued money paid by the state
This may create the illusion of helping both the farmers who got paid money to destroy their crops and the farmers who got paid more for their crops due to artificial scarcity but it actually helps people no more than destroying a window to create a job
Job creation programs are inherently bad because extra unnecessary work hours can only be formed by creating problems that did not exist before
Extra necessary work hours will be done for survival or improvement of standard of living with or without pay incentive unless a mental barrier is created that the task is physically impossible to do without money which simply can not be true as money is used to persuade people to do tasks not as a material required to create something like making a sandwich or house out of one dollar bills, nor are one dollar bills designed as a optimal fuel to transfer energy in order to complete a task even though they can burn.
Money can be an incentive not to do useful work and to waste time doing unnecessary work however if you are coerced or deceived into using money through state fees.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window
http://web.archive.org/web/20180604213800/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window
The broken window fallacy
The market loves me this I know
The market loves me this I know
For Mises followers tell me so
Money take this heart of mine
Make it devoted with its time
Watch price calculations and you see
The only path for you and me
Read Mises books they are the way
And to this path I'll only stay
Mises guards this heart of mine
Though he's dead his knowledge is divine
I've never read all the books I dread
But trust them as my living bread
Mises ghost shall follow me
To truly show
My way is right and the truth you do not know
Though I like to play pretend
Books I've never read I'll still defend
You can not know what they really mean
For his ghost is with me and makes me keen
The market it will find a way
To prove I'm right and make you pay
With its miracles every day
Every molecular reaction has its cost
And without money we are at a loss
I need not know my chemistry
For the market will figure it out for me
Without money there is no one man economy
For molecular work who would pay
The lacking sense to make the way
In creation you shall see nothing form without money
Evolution can not be true for money created life through and through
So I worship the market and give it full due
No mere chance we came to life
but our creation had a monetary price
plants and animals and all you see
Could not exist without money
Not could they be sustained
To think of another way gives me pains
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 June 4
For Mises followers tell me so
Money take this heart of mine
Make it devoted with its time
Watch price calculations and you see
The only path for you and me
Read Mises books they are the way
And to this path I'll only stay
Mises guards this heart of mine
Though he's dead his knowledge is divine
I've never read all the books I dread
But trust them as my living bread
Mises ghost shall follow me
To truly show
My way is right and the truth you do not know
Though I like to play pretend
Books I've never read I'll still defend
You can not know what they really mean
For his ghost is with me and makes me keen
The market it will find a way
To prove I'm right and make you pay
With its miracles every day
Every molecular reaction has its cost
And without money we are at a loss
I need not know my chemistry
For the market will figure it out for me
Without money there is no one man economy
For molecular work who would pay
The lacking sense to make the way
In creation you shall see nothing form without money
Evolution can not be true for money created life through and through
So I worship the market and give it full due
No mere chance we came to life
but our creation had a monetary price
plants and animals and all you see
Could not exist without money
Not could they be sustained
To think of another way gives me pains
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 June 4
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Special Relativity Experiments short
Copyright Carl Janssen 2024 I do not want to delete this content or edit it to remove things but I am not going to finish it. I will copy ...
-
Straight out I do not believe in using numerology to get super powers of tell fortunes of anything like that. I do not believe it works for...
-
Turd Flinging Monkey's Political Trichotomy 1 Freedom 2 Equality 3 Stability Not everyone shares the same values in life when it comes ...