A better one dimensional scalar method to judge the economic success of a nation is how many calories of edible plants are grown per capita per time not monetary measurements
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 December 26
Wednesday, December 26, 2018
Saturday, December 22, 2018
bethinking.org/jesus/ancient-evidence-for-jesus-from-non-christian-sources
https://web.archive.org/web/20181222211401/https://www.bethinking.org/jesus/ancient-evidence-for-jesus-from-non-christian-sources
https://www.bethinking.org/jesus/ancient-evidence-for-jesus-from-non-christian-sources
https://www.bethinking.org/jesus/ancient-evidence-for-jesus-from-non-christian-sources
John Ankerberg Gary Habermas evidence for the historic Jesus transcript
https://web.archive.org/web/20181222195153/http://www.garyhabermas.com/books/EvidenceBook/GaryHabermas_Evidence-for-the-historical-Jesus-Release_1point1.pdf
http://www.garyhabermas.com/books/EvidenceBook/GaryHabermas_Evidence-for-the-historical-Jesus-Release_1point1.pdf
http://www.garyhabermas.com/books/EvidenceBook/GaryHabermas_Evidence-for-the-historical-Jesus-Release_1point1.pdf
Wednesday, December 12, 2018
The Calculation Problem? Capitalist apologists created the monetary calculation fallacy
I think instead of determining cost by money people should use physics and chemistry as a means to determine the cost of an action. Individuals or groups of individuals voluntarily working together should calculate how much energy is transferred through work and how much of what chemicals are expended to produce what other chemicals and how much time a task takes and additionally a subjective psychological scale of how annoying or enjoyable a task is to do and what goals someone has and what the health and environmental risks are of doing vs not doing an action or doing one action for another to make economic decisions. Money does not solve a calculation problem for how scarce resources should be used instead it creates a false sense of knowledge and creates a calculation problem by replacing all those multiple factors that really matter with single factor that is an imaginary number of an imaginary monetary unit created out of nothing but an imaginary and subjective symbolic interpretation of an object or even a number tracked as electronic data created not through observation but input.
Use of money ultimately results in central planning by the institution that enforces beliefs about money through undue influence therefore the problems of central economic planning by a State or Corporation can never be solved through money.
It is laughable to claim use of money is a free market alternative to economic planning of resources by a State when money is generated by undue influence from such a state.
Some mutualists suggest Labour time vouchers an erroneous idea that someone doing an hour of "half assed" effort would produce the same value as the same individual doing an hour of "full effort" and that a skilled and talented master craftsman can produce the same quality and quantity of work in an hour as a unskilled an untalented novice. That is even if they have access to the same materials and tools.
Adfitionally, the suggested use of labour time vouchers by some mutualists is no reasonable substitution for money as time is clearly not the only cost to produce something as elements are rearranged.
One should contemplate the periodic table of elements as short of a nuclear reaction the total moles of any element in a closed system is unchanging, one element does not convert to another but their proportions and arrangements are different in each chemical compound and some reactions are reversible and others classified as irreversible, although subjective the amount of mental effort to figure out how to get from one compound to another maybe quite different, the rarity of each element is different but the total amount of each element in a closed system is yet unchanging no matter how many non nuclear reactions are done and who moves what compound where in the process of barter.
The value of everything in a system such as the planet earth (although it is somewhat an open system in that it receives and emits light) might therefore be more reasonably thought of as a matrix listing all the total quantities of isotopes of all the elements in the world. Gold would be included of course but unfortunately it is the only quantity that matters as a single scalar to be looked at by foolish minds ignoring the rest of the matrix. Other minds of even greater foolishness look at Dollars or Euros or whatever currency their State used alone.
Some might view the total value available in the world as a scalar only containing the quantity of say all the currency printed in all the countries in the world converted into American dollars and added up for all the countries in the world to get a world total amount of dollars. (Or likewise all the money printed by all the countries in the world converted into Euros for each country and added together to get a world total of Euros.)
Now each person or group would "own" a matrix of each of the isotopes of each of the elements and another matrix could be listed containing a set of unitless scalars calculated by how much each person owns of each isotope of an element divided by how much of that element exists in the whole world. This could in a sense be used to get an idea of relative wealth as a matrix rather than a single scalar of how many dollars someone owns for instance. Of course there are many problems with this as some chemicals although containing the same proportions of different elements as other chemicals have them arranged in different shapes that although subjective to measure involve different amounts of human mental effort or ingenuity to figure out how to achieve and may serve different purposes for different goals.
This all seems very complicated compared with simply looking at Dollars in exchange for items as a single scalar but in reality is much simpler as no complicated matrix math is necessary as all the scalar math with dollars is absolute nonsense if the undue influence that often brings about faith in the value of dollars is removed. We have the same reality as we always did before minus one variable the amount of dollars in the system because that is an illusion and therefore all calculations with dollars can be eliminated and people can simply look at what material things they really have and what they want.
If someone wants to have something the cost is the other objects used to produce that object and the work and time to produce it. If it already exists they can trade it one object for another in which case the cost is the object that is lost in trade in exchange for the object that is received and whatever work and time is put into the action of the trade. This was and is true all along except one factor was imagined In the cost an extra factor called money measured In units called dollars, or Euros or Yen, etc. meanwhile unfortunately people ignored the actual objects that really existed and were really involved.
In real life people who are autonomously goal directed can make these decisions without money. Any lack of ability to do so can not be solved by adding money into the situation as those who do not know what they want other than money have not achieved a ability to have informed consent of the decisions they make. Such individuals should be treated as how one teaches what were once politically incorrectly called "retards" or how one treats a minor in terms of being unable to have informed consent in this society, although this should not be based on age as unfortunately so many adults over 18 years old clearly still have not reached such a level of awareness.
Such a decision need not involve doing calculations involving exchanging one matrix listing hundreds of elements for another matrix but a much shorter set of two matrices one listing only the things one is currently contemplating receiving and the other only listing the things you are contemplating giving away in the transfer. Such as something as simple as flour, some milk and some eggs in exchange for sugar and yeast so that two people can both have ingredients for bread.
All the economics professors in the world can be fired and replaced with bakers who know recipes or chemists who know the chemical recipes of the world and physicists and other skilled people who simply know what items they need for their professions or hobbyists who know what items they want for their hobby.
There is no economics calculation problem other than the problem of imagining money and creating a useless field of economics that has nothing of value in it that is not already in chemistry or physics or simply the everyday professions such as bakers knowing what ingredients are in their food making chemistry at even the level a child learning to cook in the kitchen of more economic use than a hundred semesters of economics classes. Perhaps I am wrong as economists do know how people psychologically behave when unduly influenced to have faith in money, it is funny then how economics is not in the psychology or sociology department then.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem
https://web.archive.org/web/20181213043758/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem
https://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/usercards/MjAxMy1iYjZlODA4ZjkyNDhlNTdh.png
https://www.someecards.com/usercards/viewcard/MjAxMy0zYmM5MDFkNWEwNTc2NGMz/?tagSlug=workplace
https://web.archive.org/web/20181213060216/https://www.someecards.com/usercards/viewcard/MjAxMy0zYmM5MDFkNWEwNTc2NGMz/?tagSlug=workplace
https://web.archive.org/web/20181213060253/https://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/usercards/MjAxMy1iYjZlODA4ZjkyNDhlNTdh.png
Use of money ultimately results in central planning by the institution that enforces beliefs about money through undue influence therefore the problems of central economic planning by a State or Corporation can never be solved through money.
It is laughable to claim use of money is a free market alternative to economic planning of resources by a State when money is generated by undue influence from such a state.
Some mutualists suggest Labour time vouchers an erroneous idea that someone doing an hour of "half assed" effort would produce the same value as the same individual doing an hour of "full effort" and that a skilled and talented master craftsman can produce the same quality and quantity of work in an hour as a unskilled an untalented novice. That is even if they have access to the same materials and tools.
Adfitionally, the suggested use of labour time vouchers by some mutualists is no reasonable substitution for money as time is clearly not the only cost to produce something as elements are rearranged.
One should contemplate the periodic table of elements as short of a nuclear reaction the total moles of any element in a closed system is unchanging, one element does not convert to another but their proportions and arrangements are different in each chemical compound and some reactions are reversible and others classified as irreversible, although subjective the amount of mental effort to figure out how to get from one compound to another maybe quite different, the rarity of each element is different but the total amount of each element in a closed system is yet unchanging no matter how many non nuclear reactions are done and who moves what compound where in the process of barter.
The value of everything in a system such as the planet earth (although it is somewhat an open system in that it receives and emits light) might therefore be more reasonably thought of as a matrix listing all the total quantities of isotopes of all the elements in the world. Gold would be included of course but unfortunately it is the only quantity that matters as a single scalar to be looked at by foolish minds ignoring the rest of the matrix. Other minds of even greater foolishness look at Dollars or Euros or whatever currency their State used alone.
Some might view the total value available in the world as a scalar only containing the quantity of say all the currency printed in all the countries in the world converted into American dollars and added up for all the countries in the world to get a world total amount of dollars. (Or likewise all the money printed by all the countries in the world converted into Euros for each country and added together to get a world total of Euros.)
Now each person or group would "own" a matrix of each of the isotopes of each of the elements and another matrix could be listed containing a set of unitless scalars calculated by how much each person owns of each isotope of an element divided by how much of that element exists in the whole world. This could in a sense be used to get an idea of relative wealth as a matrix rather than a single scalar of how many dollars someone owns for instance. Of course there are many problems with this as some chemicals although containing the same proportions of different elements as other chemicals have them arranged in different shapes that although subjective to measure involve different amounts of human mental effort or ingenuity to figure out how to achieve and may serve different purposes for different goals.
This all seems very complicated compared with simply looking at Dollars in exchange for items as a single scalar but in reality is much simpler as no complicated matrix math is necessary as all the scalar math with dollars is absolute nonsense if the undue influence that often brings about faith in the value of dollars is removed. We have the same reality as we always did before minus one variable the amount of dollars in the system because that is an illusion and therefore all calculations with dollars can be eliminated and people can simply look at what material things they really have and what they want.
If someone wants to have something the cost is the other objects used to produce that object and the work and time to produce it. If it already exists they can trade it one object for another in which case the cost is the object that is lost in trade in exchange for the object that is received and whatever work and time is put into the action of the trade. This was and is true all along except one factor was imagined In the cost an extra factor called money measured In units called dollars, or Euros or Yen, etc. meanwhile unfortunately people ignored the actual objects that really existed and were really involved.
In real life people who are autonomously goal directed can make these decisions without money. Any lack of ability to do so can not be solved by adding money into the situation as those who do not know what they want other than money have not achieved a ability to have informed consent of the decisions they make. Such individuals should be treated as how one teaches what were once politically incorrectly called "retards" or how one treats a minor in terms of being unable to have informed consent in this society, although this should not be based on age as unfortunately so many adults over 18 years old clearly still have not reached such a level of awareness.
Such a decision need not involve doing calculations involving exchanging one matrix listing hundreds of elements for another matrix but a much shorter set of two matrices one listing only the things one is currently contemplating receiving and the other only listing the things you are contemplating giving away in the transfer. Such as something as simple as flour, some milk and some eggs in exchange for sugar and yeast so that two people can both have ingredients for bread.
All the economics professors in the world can be fired and replaced with bakers who know recipes or chemists who know the chemical recipes of the world and physicists and other skilled people who simply know what items they need for their professions or hobbyists who know what items they want for their hobby.
There is no economics calculation problem other than the problem of imagining money and creating a useless field of economics that has nothing of value in it that is not already in chemistry or physics or simply the everyday professions such as bakers knowing what ingredients are in their food making chemistry at even the level a child learning to cook in the kitchen of more economic use than a hundred semesters of economics classes. Perhaps I am wrong as economists do know how people psychologically behave when unduly influenced to have faith in money, it is funny then how economics is not in the psychology or sociology department then.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem
https://web.archive.org/web/20181213043758/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem
https://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/usercards/MjAxMy1iYjZlODA4ZjkyNDhlNTdh.png
https://www.someecards.com/usercards/viewcard/MjAxMy0zYmM5MDFkNWEwNTc2NGMz/?tagSlug=workplace
https://web.archive.org/web/20181213060216/https://www.someecards.com/usercards/viewcard/MjAxMy0zYmM5MDFkNWEwNTc2NGMz/?tagSlug=workplace
https://web.archive.org/web/20181213060253/https://cdn.someecards.com/someecards/usercards/MjAxMy1iYjZlODA4ZjkyNDhlNTdh.png
Murray Bookchin Post-Scarcity Anarchism
https://libcom.org/library/post-scarcity-anarchism-murray-bookchin
Note it appears to have two different file sizes listed the older archives seem to have a smaller file size, maybe multiple different editions or different formats for more recent reading devices?
https://web.archive.org/web/20181213023542/https://libcom.org/files/Post-Scarcity%20Anarchism%20-%20Murray%20Bookchin.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://libcom.org/library/post-scarcity-anarchism-murray-bookchin
http://web.archive.org/web/20120119081012/https://libcom.org/library/post-scarcity-anarchism-murray-bookchin
http://web.archive.org/web/20121224063715/http://libcom.org:80/files/Post-Scarcity%20Anarchism%20-%20Murray%20Bookchin.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20171026232912/https://libcom.org/library/post-scarcity-anarchism-murray-bookchin
http://web.archive.org/web/20150912010406/https://libcom.org/files/Bookchin-Murray-Post-Scarcity-Anarchism-1986.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20181213024258/https://libcom.org/library/post-scarcity-anarchism-murray-bookchin
http://web.archive.org/web/20181213024511/https://libcom.org/files/Bookchin-Murray-Post-Scarcity-Anarchism-1986.pdf
Note it appears to have two different file sizes listed the older archives seem to have a smaller file size, maybe multiple different editions or different formats for more recent reading devices?
https://web.archive.org/web/20181213023542/https://libcom.org/files/Post-Scarcity%20Anarchism%20-%20Murray%20Bookchin.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/*/https://libcom.org/library/post-scarcity-anarchism-murray-bookchin
http://web.archive.org/web/20120119081012/https://libcom.org/library/post-scarcity-anarchism-murray-bookchin
http://web.archive.org/web/20121224063715/http://libcom.org:80/files/Post-Scarcity%20Anarchism%20-%20Murray%20Bookchin.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20171026232912/https://libcom.org/library/post-scarcity-anarchism-murray-bookchin
http://web.archive.org/web/20150912010406/https://libcom.org/files/Bookchin-Murray-Post-Scarcity-Anarchism-1986.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20181213024258/https://libcom.org/library/post-scarcity-anarchism-murray-bookchin
http://web.archive.org/web/20181213024511/https://libcom.org/files/Bookchin-Murray-Post-Scarcity-Anarchism-1986.pdf
Seriously wrong
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://srslywrong.com/shows/
https://srslywrong.com/shows/
https://srslywrong.com/shows/
Monday, December 10, 2018
Prediction New York not to be nuked on 2018 December 20
My prediction is this prediction will turn out false
https://www.placeofsafety.com/forum/new-york-nuked-soon
https://web.archive.org/web/20181211070314/https://www.placeofsafety.com/forum/new-york-nuked-soon
Deuteronomy 18:18 - Scripture Twisting 101
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=smHtCDPeh3A
https://web.archive.org/web/20181211072111/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=smHtCDPeh3A
Sunday, December 9, 2018
The Ultramontane Catholic Church is heretical and newer than "Protestanism"
The Ultramontane Catholic Church as it is today under pope Francis did not exist until 1870 or later. Old ultrajectine Catholics do not accept Vatican 1 because it is a new teaching and not a newly discovered understanding of an old original teaching dating back to the early deposit of faith of the "Church" before 1870
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 December 9
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 December 9
Centrifugal force does not refute or confirm shape of the earth
Do a free bodied diagram. Hint if you are standing still on the earth then the earth is not spinning relative to you from your frame of reference. At what frame of reference is that measurement allegedly taken? This is irrelevant to the shape of the earth and would give the same answer either way because it is not spinning relative to you if you are standing still on either a globe or flat earth just the same. Additionally in the spinning tennis ball example below the object is experiencing angular acceleration where as this would not happen or happen less with a spinning tennis ball experiencing zero angular acceleration but spinning at a constant angular velocity.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 December 9
images and Content below is not copyrighted by me and it's copyright status is unknown
Saturday, December 8, 2018
Reason to believe in a higher power
Given that so many people do stupid things that anyone is still alive gives reason to believe a great power is intervening but only sometimes since stupid things are still being done. Given the way the elites influence people surely a great evil exists that is so strong it is hard to contemplate how anyone is still alive today especially with the invention and large number of nuclear weapons on earth. The existence of systematic evil that surely would have destroyed all life on earth if unchecked which has been yielded to by such a high percentage of order followers within humanity and yet the continuation of life on earth maybe one of the most persuasive reasons for me to suspect a sentient or intelligent good or life preserving or saving higher power exists that has prevented extinction of all life on earth thus far.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 December 8
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jrX__ILDd3w
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135111/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jrX__ILDd3w
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135503/https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135410/https://m.youtube.com/user/WhatOnEarth93/playlists
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135524/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ASUHN3gNxWo&index=2&t=0s&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135527/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=57UBuxnicOA&index=3&t=0s&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135529/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=204aGDVa3Vw&index=4&t=0s&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135533/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dUbu5UAHssM&index=5&t=0s&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 December 8
Yahweh's Amazing Miracle
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jrX__ILDd3w
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135111/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=jrX__ILDd3w
Mark Passio - Natural Law Seminar - New Haven, CT - Part 1 of 3
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ASUHN3gNxWo&index=2&t=0s&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135503/https://m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135410/https://m.youtube.com/user/WhatOnEarth93/playlists
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135524/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ASUHN3gNxWo&index=2&t=0s&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135527/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=57UBuxnicOA&index=3&t=0s&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135529/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=204aGDVa3Vw&index=4&t=0s&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208135533/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dUbu5UAHssM&index=5&t=0s&list=PLnzMmEt4pIb985hO8sonHThhauAyn_doB
Friday, December 7, 2018
George Bush from the CIA vs the Simpson's
Bush v. Simpsons
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1-T5eSUm-js
https://web.archive.org/web/20181208021629/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1-T5eSUm-js
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Special Relativity Experiments short
Copyright Carl Janssen 2024 I do not want to delete this content or edit it to remove things but I am not going to finish it. I will copy ...
-
Straight out I do not believe in using numerology to get super powers of tell fortunes of anything like that. I do not believe it works for...
-
Turd Flinging Monkey's Political Trichotomy 1 Freedom 2 Equality 3 Stability Not everyone shares the same values in life when it comes ...
