There is nobody famous in the world who has never been hated by at least one person. - Carl Janssen
Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 March 24
Sunday, March 24, 2019
Saturday, March 23, 2019
Someone Else Owes You.
Money is theft through a scam or ponzi scheme. It is an iou not an actual good or service. The iou never need be repaid because it is created out of nothing. For example if someone gives you a sand dollar for a sandwich. The sand dollar is worthless except to trade with someone else but the sandwich can be eaten. However even though nothing of value was given for something of value the person who paid nothing of value for something of value need not repay because he already gave the sand dollar on the promise that someone else would trade the otherwise worthless sand dollar for something. That is why it is not an iou it is a sou or a someone else owes you. So someone gets something from someone on the promise that a third party will pay them something useful without consulting the third party or giving someone something useful. I am not saying the sand dollar animal has no value but that in this context that the remains of the sand dollars body are only used for trade.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 23
A Ponzi scheme (/ˈpɒnzi/, Italian: [ˈpontsi]; also a Ponzi game)[1] is a form of fraud that lures investorsand pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors.[2] The scheme leads victims to believe that profits are coming from product sales or other means, and they remain unaware that other investors are the source of funds. A Ponzi scheme can maintain the illusion of a sustainable business as long as new investors contribute new funds, and as long as most of the investors do not demand full repayment and still believe in the non-existent assets they are purported to own.
http://web.archive.org/web/20190323114934/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 23
A Ponzi scheme (/ˈpɒnzi/, Italian: [ˈpontsi]; also a Ponzi game)[1] is a form of fraud that lures investorsand pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors.[2] The scheme leads victims to believe that profits are coming from product sales or other means, and they remain unaware that other investors are the source of funds. A Ponzi scheme can maintain the illusion of a sustainable business as long as new investors contribute new funds, and as long as most of the investors do not demand full repayment and still believe in the non-existent assets they are purported to own.
http://web.archive.org/web/20190323114934/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme
Friday, March 22, 2019
Invalid claims to "private property" are theft
The problem with "private property" is people often claim to own land they do not rightfully own and thus prevent other people from accessing land they could rightfully own. I don't object to someone owning a house they regularly live in and keeping others out but I object to someone claiming to own land and never using it accept to keep people stuck paying rent to them by denying people access to unused land in order to charge rent at another different location where they have a apartment complex. As that the person would not be renting a apartment if they were not forbidden from using the unused "private property" that contains no buildings just a uninhabited plot of land.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 22
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 22
Wednesday, March 20, 2019
What is your occupation?
I associate the word occupation with a hostile force enslaving people in a geographical region but others associate the word occupation with a career or job, a form of employment.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 20
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 20
Sunday, March 3, 2019
Taxation and maslow's hierarchy
Money has no value as it is simply digits on a electronic device that can be changed or printed paper with numbers written on it that would be misunderstood as being more valuable if a different number were written on it even though it's mass and number of moles of each element that compose it would change a impractically insignificant amount by printing a different set of numerical symbols on it.
This means taxation is completely unnecessary to get enough money to pay for any service and as an unlimited amount of money can be generated by using a numerical symbol equivalent to any amount of dollars desired. Even this symbol need not take up much ink no matter how large a number even a trillion to the power of a trillion times the value of a dollar as a tiny new symbol that takes up less ink than to print the number 1 (such as a dot taking less ink than a line) can simply be invented to represent that many dollars.
Taxation is not evil because it steals a physical item of value but because it unduly influences people to be employed unnecessarily for extra hours to pay for fees that they do not really owe. This employment is a slow and torturous form of mass murder that makes it more difficult for people to have access to all rungs of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. It creates a bureaucracy that kills some people through being sedentary and others from doing a distribution of physical exertion that is inappropriate and ultimately fatal. Labour as an activity of daily living can provide good health when people can choose what types of exercise they do as Labour and how much but when people can not trade tasks based on their daily needs to reduce or increase different types of Labour it inevitably results in injuries. Instead of being able to exchange tasks with other people freely based on the current tasks people feel are necessary and the current exercise they need to have or avoid having, things are assigned without freedom to do what is best for both their own and their neighbors health.
A lack of control of how labour hours are spent to achieve tasks to benefit oneself or one's neighbors but instead Labour hours being assigned to follow bureaucratic mandates through a corporate government system imposed through taxation not only causes physical problems through an improper distribution of exertion but also causes a lack of time and resources that are actually necessary but an abundance of time and resources that are misappropriated and simply misallocated to destruction and waste. And it provides an abundance of communication of lies assigned to be communicated by those unduly influenced into employment under bureaucracies while simultaneously providing a lack of communication of true facts that are desperately needed as one 's time is taken away and the fear of being fired or demoted for communicating certain true facts or at least information that someone believes to be true is instilled. As it is not only important to say what actually is true but also what one believes to be true so that if someone is wrong they have an opportunity to learn where they are wrong through discussion with others. And by learning what is wrong i do not mean learning what you will be reprimanded for saying but learning what is actually factually wrong not by popularity but by reality.
The subjugation to employment through undue influence undermines the impetus for reality testing and in some cases not only the impetus for reality testing but the access to information itself negating the ability of even someone who has overcome the motivational barriers created.
Taxation brings about stagnation and starvation not through taking away physical things directly but through unduly influencing people to bring environmental havoc and destruction of their own things as well as the lack of time to make them and the lack of resources available after they were unduly influenced to sabotage their own supply through an excess of misappropriated Labour hours doing not the Labour that should be done but the Labour that should not be done consuming and destroying resources in the process and taking them away from those in need resulting in deaths from scarcity in one part of the world and death through over abundance in another.
The employment system created through taxation rather than individual and communal needs and wants damages relationships and mental health through the stress of lack of materials or the fear of their lack as well as the distortion in communication that is toxic to the potential for good relationships. Many people are unduly influenced to take up vices to deal with the damage to the relational and mental health portions of Moscow's hierarchy especially being deceived by a system so oppositional to knowledge of what is true and false as to mistake vices as a solution rather than virtue through all I already mentioned and additionally a bombardment of advertisements to sell vices to fuel the whole system of destruction. Most deaths are not caused through overt homicide but through an abundant lifestyle of doing things one ought not do with an abundance of resources to misuse or overuse or through scarcity of resources necessary for life such as food, water or drugs. The resources that one person lacks may kill them but these are the same resources that another has but overuses or misuses to kill themself.
This relational and mental health damage not only causes self destruction but a lack of concern to help your neighbors in need who are lacking with life saving services or material goods or in some cases a lack of concern to try to virtuosly influence them away from a life of vice and towards a life of virtue to give them opportunity to more easily choose to save their life from a path of self destruction.
It is not the removal of money that brings destruction through taxation but the propagation of the belief in money or for those who do not believe in money the actions in accordance with a faith in money contrary to their beliefs. It is no longer the removal of a physical object used as money or currency that brings destruction through taxation but in actuality the influence through the propagation of false information resulting in destructive behavioural changes.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 3
This means taxation is completely unnecessary to get enough money to pay for any service and as an unlimited amount of money can be generated by using a numerical symbol equivalent to any amount of dollars desired. Even this symbol need not take up much ink no matter how large a number even a trillion to the power of a trillion times the value of a dollar as a tiny new symbol that takes up less ink than to print the number 1 (such as a dot taking less ink than a line) can simply be invented to represent that many dollars.
Taxation is not evil because it steals a physical item of value but because it unduly influences people to be employed unnecessarily for extra hours to pay for fees that they do not really owe. This employment is a slow and torturous form of mass murder that makes it more difficult for people to have access to all rungs of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. It creates a bureaucracy that kills some people through being sedentary and others from doing a distribution of physical exertion that is inappropriate and ultimately fatal. Labour as an activity of daily living can provide good health when people can choose what types of exercise they do as Labour and how much but when people can not trade tasks based on their daily needs to reduce or increase different types of Labour it inevitably results in injuries. Instead of being able to exchange tasks with other people freely based on the current tasks people feel are necessary and the current exercise they need to have or avoid having, things are assigned without freedom to do what is best for both their own and their neighbors health.
A lack of control of how labour hours are spent to achieve tasks to benefit oneself or one's neighbors but instead Labour hours being assigned to follow bureaucratic mandates through a corporate government system imposed through taxation not only causes physical problems through an improper distribution of exertion but also causes a lack of time and resources that are actually necessary but an abundance of time and resources that are misappropriated and simply misallocated to destruction and waste. And it provides an abundance of communication of lies assigned to be communicated by those unduly influenced into employment under bureaucracies while simultaneously providing a lack of communication of true facts that are desperately needed as one 's time is taken away and the fear of being fired or demoted for communicating certain true facts or at least information that someone believes to be true is instilled. As it is not only important to say what actually is true but also what one believes to be true so that if someone is wrong they have an opportunity to learn where they are wrong through discussion with others. And by learning what is wrong i do not mean learning what you will be reprimanded for saying but learning what is actually factually wrong not by popularity but by reality.
The subjugation to employment through undue influence undermines the impetus for reality testing and in some cases not only the impetus for reality testing but the access to information itself negating the ability of even someone who has overcome the motivational barriers created.
Taxation brings about stagnation and starvation not through taking away physical things directly but through unduly influencing people to bring environmental havoc and destruction of their own things as well as the lack of time to make them and the lack of resources available after they were unduly influenced to sabotage their own supply through an excess of misappropriated Labour hours doing not the Labour that should be done but the Labour that should not be done consuming and destroying resources in the process and taking them away from those in need resulting in deaths from scarcity in one part of the world and death through over abundance in another.
The employment system created through taxation rather than individual and communal needs and wants damages relationships and mental health through the stress of lack of materials or the fear of their lack as well as the distortion in communication that is toxic to the potential for good relationships. Many people are unduly influenced to take up vices to deal with the damage to the relational and mental health portions of Moscow's hierarchy especially being deceived by a system so oppositional to knowledge of what is true and false as to mistake vices as a solution rather than virtue through all I already mentioned and additionally a bombardment of advertisements to sell vices to fuel the whole system of destruction. Most deaths are not caused through overt homicide but through an abundant lifestyle of doing things one ought not do with an abundance of resources to misuse or overuse or through scarcity of resources necessary for life such as food, water or drugs. The resources that one person lacks may kill them but these are the same resources that another has but overuses or misuses to kill themself.
This relational and mental health damage not only causes self destruction but a lack of concern to help your neighbors in need who are lacking with life saving services or material goods or in some cases a lack of concern to try to virtuosly influence them away from a life of vice and towards a life of virtue to give them opportunity to more easily choose to save their life from a path of self destruction.
It is not the removal of money that brings destruction through taxation but the propagation of the belief in money or for those who do not believe in money the actions in accordance with a faith in money contrary to their beliefs. It is no longer the removal of a physical object used as money or currency that brings destruction through taxation but in actuality the influence through the propagation of false information resulting in destructive behavioural changes.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 3
Saturday, March 2, 2019
Minimum wage laws are not enough to solve the problems of employment
Laws usually do not fix things because politicians write in exemptions so they can continue to exploit workers. If volunteering to do something without pay should be legal that is less than minimum wage. So it is ok to work for zero dollars per hour or at minimum wage but not at halfway between those two. The problem is not how much someone can get paid it they have a right to refuse a job with too little pay. The problem is our society is set up to punish people for refusing to be employed with existence fees that force employment instead of self sufficient Labour without pay and that people look down on the unemployed and try to punish them for not having an employer to be their arbitrary slave master. I have no problem with voluntary employment but forced employment through government regulation is slavery.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 2
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8pFC3LKMIQo
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8pFC3LKMIQo
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 2
Pelosi's Double Standard on the Minimum Wage
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8pFC3LKMIQo
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8pFC3LKMIQo
My opinions on anarcho syndicalism and Noam Chomsky
Anarcho Syndicalism Noam Chomsky style is not anarchism it is just massive taxation. Anarcho Syndicalist end game goals sound a lot to me like a worldwide government with one big vote. I agree with them that the corporate employment structure has a lot of the same ethical problems that so called anarcho capitalists object to the State doing but do not support a giant bureaucracy run by employees being the employer of all other employees by a voting structure as a solution, it sounds like slavery with extra steps to me unless being in one of their collectives is voluntary and people can choose a more individualistic approach to their life or to not be a automatic member of a collective without consent. Also I do not necessarily support their strategy of workers intentionally slowing down or sabotaging the workplace as most workers are also consumers or customers and it maybe harmful to the consumer or customer in terms of customer service just leading to more problems for other workers. If the goal of working is to produce a good or service to benefit someone it would make the world a better place to speed up production and have more free time if it does not cause additional harm to the workers, other people or the environment. Unfortunately workers who speed up are rarely rewarded with more free time and the same pay in the modern workplace.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 2
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 2
Can you logically prove the validity of a statistical worldview without resorting to statistics tests?
Can you show that belief in probability will make one's life better without using statistics that involve probability to show that those who believe in probability have a statistically significant better life based on a statistics test for a measured outcome that invokes the assumption of a probability distribution function for a measured outcome?
That is you could for example experimentally test a claim that those who believe in probability and apply statistics that invokes probability to their life decisions have a statistically significant chance of having a higher income in their bank account than those who reject a statistical worldview using probability within an alpha value of 0.05 for a paired or unpaired and dependent or independent one tail t test. And then either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis for that test. And additionally do a statistical test to make sure each of the samples tested for the t test are both selected from normally distributed populations within an alpha value of 0.05 and either rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis that they are normally distributed on that test and in the case of failing to reject that null hypothesis concluding there was at least a 95% chance you were correct to choose to do a t test but in the case of rejecting the null hypothesis conclude that a t test would have at least a 5% chance that it was not correct to select a t test in the first place and you should have selected another test because there was at least a 5% chance that the sample for which you rejected this null hypothesis was not selected from a normally distributed population.
But would that be circular reasoning that never supports the validity of a statistical worldview in the first place without first assuming a very specific statistical worldview in order to test the claim that those who believe in such a statistical worldview are statistically significantly be more likely to have a better life outcome of the type you choose to measure and in the direction you chose to consider to be better? This would beg the question if the statistical worldview you chose to measure this was correct in the first place and additionally only give the answer you desired to support the validity of statistics for the alpha value you chose but not for a lower alpha value greater than zero but less than the alpha value you selected and it would fail to support your claim at a probability of that alpha value according to your statistical worldview you used to analyze this in the first place.
Once a event has already happened does it have a 100% chance that it would have occurred even though prior to the event happening it was assumed to have a percent chance that it would have happened less than 100% but greater than zero percent?
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 2
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes'_theorem
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://ecodevoevo.blogspot.com/2012/01/probability-does-not-exist-part-i-very.html
Bayes’ formula helps scientists assess the probability that something is true based on new data. For example, doctors can use the result of a mammogram exam, which is sometimes wrong, to assess whether they should revise their assessment that a patient has breast cancer.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190302174347/https://qz.com/1315731/the-most-important-formula-in-data-science-was-first-used-to-prove-the-existence-of-god/
That is you could for example experimentally test a claim that those who believe in probability and apply statistics that invokes probability to their life decisions have a statistically significant chance of having a higher income in their bank account than those who reject a statistical worldview using probability within an alpha value of 0.05 for a paired or unpaired and dependent or independent one tail t test. And then either reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis for that test. And additionally do a statistical test to make sure each of the samples tested for the t test are both selected from normally distributed populations within an alpha value of 0.05 and either rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis that they are normally distributed on that test and in the case of failing to reject that null hypothesis concluding there was at least a 95% chance you were correct to choose to do a t test but in the case of rejecting the null hypothesis conclude that a t test would have at least a 5% chance that it was not correct to select a t test in the first place and you should have selected another test because there was at least a 5% chance that the sample for which you rejected this null hypothesis was not selected from a normally distributed population.
But would that be circular reasoning that never supports the validity of a statistical worldview in the first place without first assuming a very specific statistical worldview in order to test the claim that those who believe in such a statistical worldview are statistically significantly be more likely to have a better life outcome of the type you choose to measure and in the direction you chose to consider to be better? This would beg the question if the statistical worldview you chose to measure this was correct in the first place and additionally only give the answer you desired to support the validity of statistics for the alpha value you chose but not for a lower alpha value greater than zero but less than the alpha value you selected and it would fail to support your claim at a probability of that alpha value according to your statistical worldview you used to analyze this in the first place.
Once a event has already happened does it have a 100% chance that it would have occurred even though prior to the event happening it was assumed to have a percent chance that it would have happened less than 100% but greater than zero percent?
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 2
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayes'_theorem
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://ecodevoevo.blogspot.com/2012/01/probability-does-not-exist-part-i-very.html
Bayes’ formula helps scientists assess the probability that something is true based on new data. For example, doctors can use the result of a mammogram exam, which is sometimes wrong, to assess whether they should revise their assessment that a patient has breast cancer.
https://web.archive.org/web/20190302174347/https://qz.com/1315731/the-most-important-formula-in-data-science-was-first-used-to-prove-the-existence-of-god/
Saturday, February 23, 2019
Taking a break from blogging
I am taking a break from blogging for a while until certain situations are resolved. Feel free to look at my old articles and post comments and proof reading suggestions and also do the same for my other blogs listed on this blog if you search around enough.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 February 23.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 February 23.
Thursday, February 7, 2019
electricvehiclewiki
http://www.electricvehiclewiki.com
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.electricvehiclewiki.com
https://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.electricvehiclewiki.com
Thursday, January 24, 2019
Make Slack not work
Libertarians should support slack but sadly many "capitalist" libertarians obsessed with the phrase, "Austrian economics" do not.
Focus on monetary economic models is a dead end if it opposes slack. How can Libertarians promote a policy of greater slack than "socialists" and "communists," to make Libertarianism attractive to working class people who are tired of 40 hour work weeks and coming home only to spend more time to prepare for work. The "market" "creating" products does not create slack during the 40 hours of employment in which someone is under the misery of working for an employer. The most devastating thing about taxes is the work you had to do under an employer to earn the money to pay the taxes, as the theft of taxes is the extra hours you worked. How then can true Libertarians argue in favor of creating employment opportunities as a strength of a free market? Is not the evil of "communism" forced employment to the State?
Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 January 24 ,
Focus on monetary economic models is a dead end if it opposes slack. How can Libertarians promote a policy of greater slack than "socialists" and "communists," to make Libertarianism attractive to working class people who are tired of 40 hour work weeks and coming home only to spend more time to prepare for work. The "market" "creating" products does not create slack during the 40 hours of employment in which someone is under the misery of working for an employer. The most devastating thing about taxes is the work you had to do under an employer to earn the money to pay the taxes, as the theft of taxes is the extra hours you worked. How then can true Libertarians argue in favor of creating employment opportunities as a strength of a free market? Is not the evil of "communism" forced employment to the State?
Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 January 24 ,
Church of the SubGenius - Slack Explained
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BbHjybg50BU
https://web.archive.org/web/20190124103235/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BbHjybg50BU
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Special Relativity Experiments short
Copyright Carl Janssen 2024 I do not want to delete this content or edit it to remove things but I am not going to finish it. I will copy ...
-
Straight out I do not believe in using numerology to get super powers of tell fortunes of anything like that. I do not believe it works for...
-
Turd Flinging Monkey's Political Trichotomy 1 Freedom 2 Equality 3 Stability Not everyone shares the same values in life when it comes ...
