What is the probability that probability based statistics is wrong on a fundamental basis based on its axioms ?

What is the probability that probability based statistics is wrong on a fundamental basis based on its axioms ?

Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 September 6

Speed Trap Proverb

http://web.archive.org/web/20190812062705im_/https://i.imgflip.com/37t1gd.jpg

http://web.archive.org/web/20190812062704/https://imgflip.com/i/37t1gd

None Dare Call it Conspiracy

http://web.archive.org/web/20190715040626/http://www.whatonearthishappening.com/images/stories/woeih/podcast/205/None-Dare-Call-It-Conspiracy.pdf

http://web.archive.org/web/20190715040626if_/http://www.whatonearthishappening.com/images/stories/woeih/podcast/205/None-Dare-Call-It-Conspiracy.pdf

Real life flying saucer "ufo"

https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/qn2x62G5GmM/mqdefault.webp

http://web.archive.org/web/20190627205131/https://i.ytimg.com/vi_webp/qn2x62G5GmM/mqdefault.webp

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qn2x62G5GmM

https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qn2x62G5GmM

Flight of the Future - Science Fiction or Reality

Naked Science

https://m.youtube.com/user/PioneerProductionsUK

http://web.archive.org/web/20190621011125/https://m.youtube.com/user/PioneerProductionsUK

Where does the Talmud say the words in the Talmud are from G-d the Tanakh has phrases like G-d said all over the place?  The Tanakh is fundamentally different than the Talmud in that it has phrases in it claimed to be the word of God, in fact whole paragraphs where as the quotations of the rabbis in the Talmud are only claimed to be inspired by G-d by those who have not even skimmed it as they must contradict each other as the rabbis disagreements are written.  Show me the rare and few and far between examples (if there are any) that prove me wrong in a small percentage of the text in the comments.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 April 29

Local creation

What if God created a universe that exists eternally both backwards and forwards in time and has unlimited size in all three known Cartesian special dimensions but the creation of the earth in Genesis 1 refers to a restatement of matter on a local level near where the earth is over approximately a 144 hour period of time that would have happened approximately 4000 years before the incarnation of Christ (About 4000 BC or 4000 BCE) the sun and moon and solar system could have been locally made through rearrangement of matter along with some nearby stars while far away stars could have already existed prior to 4000 BC.  I am not saying this is true or untrue this is just a thought or idea.

copyright Carl Janssen 2019 April 11

YouTube

Universe.The.Cosmology.Quest.Part2of2.wmv

Jan Aage

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Sb_EWnXCu2w

https://web.archive.org/web/20190411122846/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Sb_EWnXCu2w


https://web.archive.org/web/20180826192410/http://www.conspiracyoflight.com/Cosmology/Big_Bang_Critique.html

The simplest explanation is not necessarily usually the correct explanation

The simplest explanation is not necessarily usually the correct explanation even if it is more likely than a single more complicated explanation because there are multiple more complicated explanations. 

Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 April 2

Taxes are evil as they make definition of theft unclear

Everything is stolen because of taxes.  There is no longer a way to know objective ownership anymore.  Taxation is evil not merely because it is theft but because it makes it impossible to know if anything else is theft anymore.  But if you take my stuff I will report you because I want it back.  - Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 March 27

There is nobody famous in the world who has never been hated by at least one person.

There is nobody famous in the world who has never been hated by at least one person. - Carl Janssen

Copyright Carl Janssen 2019 March 24

Someone Else Owes You.

Money is theft through a scam or ponzi scheme.  It is an iou not an actual good or service.  The iou never need be repaid because it is created out of nothing.  For example if someone gives you a sand dollar for a sandwich.  The sand dollar is worthless except to trade with someone else but the sandwich can be eaten.   However even though nothing of value was given for something of value the person who paid nothing of value for something of value need not repay because he already gave the sand dollar on the promise that someone else would trade the otherwise worthless sand dollar for something.   That is why it is not an iou it is a sou or a someone else owes you.  So someone gets something from someone on the promise that a third party will pay them something useful without consulting the third party or giving someone something useful.  I am not saying the sand dollar animal has no value but that in this context that the remains of the sand dollars body are only used for trade.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 23

A Ponzi scheme (/ˈpɒnzi/, Italian: [ˈpontsi]; also a Ponzi game)^[1] is a form of fraud that lures investorsand pays profits to earlier investors with funds from more recent investors.^[2] The scheme leads victims to believe that profits are coming from product sales or other means, and they remain unaware that other investors are the source of funds. A Ponzi scheme can maintain the illusion of a sustainable business as long as new investors contribute new funds, and as long as most of the investors do not demand full repayment and still believe in the non-existent assets they are purported to own.

http://web.archive.org/web/20190323114934/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme

Invalid claims to "private property" are theft

The problem with "private property" is people often claim to own land they do not rightfully own and thus prevent other people from accessing land they could rightfully own.  I don't object to someone owning a house they regularly live in and keeping others out but I object to someone claiming to own land and never using it accept to keep people stuck paying rent to them by denying people access to unused land in order to charge rent at another different location where they have a apartment complex.  As that the person would not be renting a apartment if they were not forbidden from using the unused "private property" that contains no buildings just a uninhabited plot of land.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 March 22