Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 August 29
https://web.archive.org/web/20180829083234/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sentebele-Pilgrim-Progress.jpg
Wednesday, August 29, 2018
An ancap plutocrat can not maintain ownership of the world
Anarchism is not about abolishing government but believing States are fabrications used as tools of undue influence. There are many voluntary systems people can agree to on a local level when it comes to so called property but the claim that individuals consented to such systems when they did not is fabricated when it comes to claims by the United States for example. Different voluntary communities can have different systems and the freedom to disassociate with people from communities whose system they disagree with. A rich man who everyone hates by going too far will find no one to guard his property or even if he does may find himself soon bankrupt at the increased expense of unpopularity for claiming to own the whole world and be no longer able to back up his claim with force. More over it there is an ancom community nearby and workers are not treated well enough they may relocate and without someone to persuade through money the amassed money of an ancap can no longer persuade people to do provide work or resources in exchange for money. This means ancap and ancom believers can co exist in separate geographic regions without a one and only rich person laying hold to ownership of everything in the whole world to the detriment of everyone else, so long as unbelief in the state among the aggregate of sentient individuals is sufficient, irregardless of preference for "communist" or "capitalist" economics among anarchists.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 August 29
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/62/Sentebele-Pilgrim-Progress.jpg/400px-Sentebele-Pilgrim-Progress.jpg
https://web.archive.org/web/20180829083234/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sentebele-Pilgrim-Progress.jpg
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 August 29
https://web.archive.org/web/20180829083234/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sentebele-Pilgrim-Progress.jpg
Saturday, August 18, 2018
Corpus Quran learning tool
https://web.archive.org/web/20180818170104/http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp
http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp
http://corpus.quran.com/wordbyword.jsp
Thursday, August 16, 2018
15 degrees per hour, globe vs flat earth video critique
I am not endorsing or refuting flat or globe earth by saying this. However I would like to point out a possible error in this video. He claims everyone can agree they see the sun shift approximately 15 degrees every hour no matter where they stand on earth. But in the north and south poles there is continual light or darkness for multiple days at a time. This makes me suspect he is wrong in his premise of the approximately 15 degree shift per hour being true everywhere in the world. I doubt it fits this pattern during times of continual daylight, although this would not necessarily be impossible because
1 the axis of rotation (the vector perpendicular to the rotation) can itself rotate
2 a change of negative 15 degrees per hour or positive 15 degrees per hour are both 15 degree per hour changes although in opposite directions, if the speed was constantly approximately 15 degrees per hour but the direction occasionally flips to the opposite direction this could prevent sunset or sunrise.
3 the sun appears to travel up starting in a location East of the observer at sunrise and then down towards a location West of the observer at sunset for people close enough to the equator but there also maybe a North and South component depending on your location and the sun could not always be pure East or pure West in its direction of apparent travel. The sun could rotate in the direction perpendicular to up without changing elevation enough to end continual daylight for periods of time longer than 24 hours near the poles. That is instead of appearing to primarily move up or down for someone as close to a pole as possible without being at a point where north, south, east and west are undefined or unclearly defined the sun could move around to appear north, south, east or west of the observer at different times of day without changing or with little enough change in the angle of elevation to break continuous daylight for long periods of time.
In short the video maker should have defined more clearly what he meant by angle. I am skeptical that the angle of apparent elevation changes at approximately 15 degrees per hour at every 1 hour interval and does not depart from that rate a practically significant amount for individuals on or near the poles. He should measure two angles for the sun not only one angle although a single angle can be used if you create a new coordinate system that is constantly shifting relative to another coordinate system.
He does have an interesting point that should be considered in the debate of the earth 's shape but needs more mathematically rigorous definitions of his coordinate systems to explain to his viewers. More rigorous than what I have done in explaining this.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018
Antarctica has just two seasons: summer and winter. Antarctica has six months of daylight in its summer and six months of darkness in its winter.
https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what-is-antarctica-58.html
https://web.archive.org/web20150729235203/http://www.nasa.gov:80/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what-is-antarctica-58.html
Is rotation a vector
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/301/lectures/node100.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20180817031943/http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/301/lectures/node100.html
1 the axis of rotation (the vector perpendicular to the rotation) can itself rotate
2 a change of negative 15 degrees per hour or positive 15 degrees per hour are both 15 degree per hour changes although in opposite directions, if the speed was constantly approximately 15 degrees per hour but the direction occasionally flips to the opposite direction this could prevent sunset or sunrise.
3 the sun appears to travel up starting in a location East of the observer at sunrise and then down towards a location West of the observer at sunset for people close enough to the equator but there also maybe a North and South component depending on your location and the sun could not always be pure East or pure West in its direction of apparent travel. The sun could rotate in the direction perpendicular to up without changing elevation enough to end continual daylight for periods of time longer than 24 hours near the poles. That is instead of appearing to primarily move up or down for someone as close to a pole as possible without being at a point where north, south, east and west are undefined or unclearly defined the sun could move around to appear north, south, east or west of the observer at different times of day without changing or with little enough change in the angle of elevation to break continuous daylight for long periods of time.
In short the video maker should have defined more clearly what he meant by angle. I am skeptical that the angle of apparent elevation changes at approximately 15 degrees per hour at every 1 hour interval and does not depart from that rate a practically significant amount for individuals on or near the poles. He should measure two angles for the sun not only one angle although a single angle can be used if you create a new coordinate system that is constantly shifting relative to another coordinate system.
He does have an interesting point that should be considered in the debate of the earth 's shape but needs more mathematically rigorous definitions of his coordinate systems to explain to his viewers. More rigorous than what I have done in explaining this.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018
Antarctica has just two seasons: summer and winter. Antarctica has six months of daylight in its summer and six months of darkness in its winter.
https://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what-is-antarctica-58.html
https://web.archive.org/web20150729235203/http://www.nasa.gov:80/audience/forstudents/5-8/features/nasa-knows/what-is-antarctica-58.html
Is rotation a vector
http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/301/lectures/node100.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20180817031943/http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/301/lectures/node100.html
UNDENIABLE! One Simple & Fatal Flaw of the Flat Earth "Model"
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=m0x8CEp58uE
https://web.archive.org/web/20180817022914/https://m.youtube.com/watch?
v=m0x8CEp58uE
Wednesday, August 15, 2018
Illegal to be homeless
https://www.nationalhomeless.org/publications/crimreport/allcities.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20180816033611/https://www.nationalhomeless.org/publications/crimreport/allcities.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20180816033611/https://www.nationalhomeless.org/publications/crimreport/allcities.html
Wednesday, August 8, 2018
Rent is slavery
I am going to change my slogan from rent is theft to rent is slavery. I believe this is consistent with anarcho capitalism because in order to steal something someone else has to own it first, giving a reason to dispute freeloading as stealing the private property of the land "LORD." I dispute the claims of ownership of land by the state that maintain the rent system in practice. Refusing to pay rent to someone who is not the legitimate owner is not theft and insisting said rent be paid when you are not the legitimate owner and enforcing that through the violence of the state is slavery. In theory rent is not slavery but in practice in the current society of the United States rent is slavery. Just like self proposed capitalists claim communism works in theory but is bad in practice. Anarcho capitalists should stop legitimizing rent as currently practiced in the United States.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 August 8
https://web.archive.org/web/20091002101309/http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/CreditRiver/CreditRiver.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20100131051943/http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/creditriver.html
https://prepareforchange.net/2018/07/05/judge-poisoned-after-ruling-bank-foreclosure-is-illegal-and-all-mortgages-are-null-and-void/
https://web.archive.org/web/20180808234159/https://prepareforchange.net/2018/07/05/judge-poisoned-after-ruling-bank-foreclosure-is-illegal-and-all-mortgages-are-null-and-void/
Daly based his defense on the argument that the bank had not actually loaned him any money but had simply created credit on its books. Daly argued that the bank had thus not given him anything of value and was not entitled to the property that secured the loan. The jury and the justice of the peace, Martin V. Mahoney, agreed with this argument. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and the justice of the peace declared that the mortgage was "null and void" and that the bank was not entitled to possession of the property.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_National_Bank_of_Montgomery_v._Daly
https://web.archive.org/web/20180808234622/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_National_Bank_of_Montgomery_v._Daly
Accusations of people poisoning judge in retribution for his ruling
https://web.archive.org/web/20181231085603/https://harmonyhealth.wordpress.com/2009/12/18/the-man-who-humbled-the-federal-reserve/
https://web.archive.org/web/20181231085650/https://www.dtss.us/blog/the-story-of-a-judge-who-was-poisoned-after-ruling-bank-foreclosure-is-illegal-and-all-mortgages-are-null-and-void/
https://web.archive.org/web/20181231085741/https://criminalbankingmonopoly.wordpress.com/montgomery-vs-daly/
https://web.archive.org/web/20181231085809/https://hubpages.com/politics/Judge-Poisoned-After-Ruling-Bank-Forclosure-is-Illegal-and-All-Mortgages-are-Null-and-Void
Lord is an appellation for a person or deity who has authority, control, or power over others acting like a master, a chief, or a ruler.[1][2]The appellation can also denote certain persons who hold a title of the peerage in the United Kingdom, or are entitled to courtesy titles. The collective "Lords" can refer to a group or body of peers.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord
Under the feudal system, "lord" had a wide, loose and varied meaning. An overlord was a person from whom a landholding or a manor was held by a mesne lord or vassal under various forms of feudal land tenure. The modern term "landlord" is a vestigial survival of this function. A liege lord was a person to whom a vassal owed sworn allegiance. Neither of these terms were titular dignities, but rather factual appellations, which described the relationship between two or more persons within the highly stratified feudal social system. For example, a man might be Lord of the Manor to his own tenants but also a vassal of his own overlord, who in turn was a vassal of the King. Where a knight was a lord of the manor, he was referred to in contemporary documents as "John (Surname), knight, lord of (manor name)". A feudal baron was a true titular dignity, with the right to attend Parliament, but a feudal baron, Lord of the Manor of many manors, was a vassal of the King.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord
Lord is used as a title of deference for various gods or deities. The earliest recorded use of Lord in the English language in a religious context was by English Bible translators such as Bede. However, Bede wrote in Latin, and was described by Michael Lapidge as "without question the most accomplished Latinist produced in these islands in the Anglo-Saxon period." He used an Anglo-Saxon phrase that indicated a noble, prince, ruler or lord to refer to the LORD, however he applied this as a gloss to the Latin text that he was producing, and not as a clear translation of the term itself. Lord, as a gloss to 'dryhten' in the Old English language, meant royal, ruler, prince, noble, and did not indicate a deity. After the Norman invasion and the influx of French Catholics, this understanding began to be applied to religious texts as well, however, that was during the Middle Ages and not the Dark Ages of Bede's time. It was widely used in the King James Bible translated in the 17th century, see also Jesus is Lord.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord
https://web.archive.org/web/20180808232533/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 August 8
https://web.archive.org/web/20091002101309/http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/CreditRiver/CreditRiver.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20100131051943/http://www.lawlibrary.state.mn.us/creditriver.html
https://prepareforchange.net/2018/07/05/judge-poisoned-after-ruling-bank-foreclosure-is-illegal-and-all-mortgages-are-null-and-void/
https://web.archive.org/web/20180808234159/https://prepareforchange.net/2018/07/05/judge-poisoned-after-ruling-bank-foreclosure-is-illegal-and-all-mortgages-are-null-and-void/
Daly based his defense on the argument that the bank had not actually loaned him any money but had simply created credit on its books. Daly argued that the bank had thus not given him anything of value and was not entitled to the property that secured the loan. The jury and the justice of the peace, Martin V. Mahoney, agreed with this argument. The jury returned a verdict for the defendant, and the justice of the peace declared that the mortgage was "null and void" and that the bank was not entitled to possession of the property.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_National_Bank_of_Montgomery_v._Daly
https://web.archive.org/web/20180808234622/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_National_Bank_of_Montgomery_v._Daly
Accusations of people poisoning judge in retribution for his ruling
https://web.archive.org/web/20181231085603/https://harmonyhealth.wordpress.com/2009/12/18/the-man-who-humbled-the-federal-reserve/
https://web.archive.org/web/20181231085650/https://www.dtss.us/blog/the-story-of-a-judge-who-was-poisoned-after-ruling-bank-foreclosure-is-illegal-and-all-mortgages-are-null-and-void/
https://web.archive.org/web/20181231085741/https://criminalbankingmonopoly.wordpress.com/montgomery-vs-daly/
https://web.archive.org/web/20181231085809/https://hubpages.com/politics/Judge-Poisoned-After-Ruling-Bank-Forclosure-is-Illegal-and-All-Mortgages-are-Null-and-Void
Lord is an appellation for a person or deity who has authority, control, or power over others acting like a master, a chief, or a ruler.[1][2]The appellation can also denote certain persons who hold a title of the peerage in the United Kingdom, or are entitled to courtesy titles. The collective "Lords" can refer to a group or body of peers.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord
Under the feudal system, "lord" had a wide, loose and varied meaning. An overlord was a person from whom a landholding or a manor was held by a mesne lord or vassal under various forms of feudal land tenure. The modern term "landlord" is a vestigial survival of this function. A liege lord was a person to whom a vassal owed sworn allegiance. Neither of these terms were titular dignities, but rather factual appellations, which described the relationship between two or more persons within the highly stratified feudal social system. For example, a man might be Lord of the Manor to his own tenants but also a vassal of his own overlord, who in turn was a vassal of the King. Where a knight was a lord of the manor, he was referred to in contemporary documents as "John (Surname), knight, lord of (manor name)". A feudal baron was a true titular dignity, with the right to attend Parliament, but a feudal baron, Lord of the Manor of many manors, was a vassal of the King.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord
Lord is used as a title of deference for various gods or deities. The earliest recorded use of Lord in the English language in a religious context was by English Bible translators such as Bede. However, Bede wrote in Latin, and was described by Michael Lapidge as "without question the most accomplished Latinist produced in these islands in the Anglo-Saxon period." He used an Anglo-Saxon phrase that indicated a noble, prince, ruler or lord to refer to the LORD, however he applied this as a gloss to the Latin text that he was producing, and not as a clear translation of the term itself. Lord, as a gloss to 'dryhten' in the Old English language, meant royal, ruler, prince, noble, and did not indicate a deity. After the Norman invasion and the influx of French Catholics, this understanding began to be applied to religious texts as well, however, that was during the Middle Ages and not the Dark Ages of Bede's time. It was widely used in the King James Bible translated in the 17th century, see also Jesus is Lord.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord
https://web.archive.org/web/20180808232533/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord
You Can Always Leave
https://m.youtube.com/watch?reload=9&v=fasTSY-dB-s
Is homesteading a justification for Private Property & Capitalism? + Fable of Stefan Molyneux Jr
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu0JeGeEKSc
https://web.archive.org/web/20180808232901/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Gu0JeGeEKSc
Arguments Against Capitalism EP3 Pt2 - Private Property Vs Personal Property
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SMskfrm62YA
https://web.archive.org/web/20180808233656/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SMskfrm62YA
Why homestead can justify personal property not private propert (landlordism, Capitalism etc)
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xS4sEJxJK9A
https://web.archive.org/web/20180808233827/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xS4sEJxJK9A
Daly v First National Bank of Montgomery
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xSqi1N_RrUs
https://web.archive.org/web/20180808234433/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xSqi1N_RrUs
How To Be a Crook
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2oHbwdNcHbc
https://web.archive.org/web/20160916120731/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oHbwdNcHbc&app=desktop
Yanis Varoufakis: Is Capitalism Devouring Democracy?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gGeevtdp1WQ
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gGeevtdp1WQ
Who Owns The World?
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V2hyLO7LtHE
https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=V2hyLO7LtHE
Monday, August 6, 2018
California should require lithium batteries to be replaced with cleaner diazepam
There has been much talk about a plastic straw ban in California even with talk of replacing them with paper straws but I say we should outlaw paper and lithium. We can replace all lithium batteries owned by government employees with diazepam. This should reduce pollution from when lithium batteries are disposed of incorrectly after government computers used for paperwork or data entry are discarded. Although there would be a drastic reduce in ability to produce paperwork if you only got rid of lithium but I believe if government officials are given diazepam instead of lithium batteries they would find a way to cope with the paperwork reduction. Outlawing paper will also save many trees and there would be the additional benefit of preventing drug dealers from having such easy access to blotter paper and lithium.
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2018/10/24/18010592/future-perfect-podcast-lithium-drinking-water-suicide
https://web.archive.org/web/20181027074402/https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2018/10/24/18010592/future-perfect-podcast-lithium-drinking-water-suicide
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSVj7Dzjuqhk4Lq5BZFdQV2DE9U7GKdnO81q2VGGNqq3XLDEX88jfYUtA
https://web.archive.org/web/20180807014746/https://theidioteconomist.wordpress.com/tag/lithium-ion-batteries/
Copyright Carl Janssen 2018
https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2018/10/24/18010592/future-perfect-podcast-lithium-drinking-water-suicide
https://web.archive.org/web/20181027074402/https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/2018/10/24/18010592/future-perfect-podcast-lithium-drinking-water-suicide
https://web.archive.org/web/20180807014746/https://theidioteconomist.wordpress.com/tag/lithium-ion-batteries/
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
Special Relativity Experiments short
Copyright Carl Janssen 2024 I do not want to delete this content or edit it to remove things but I am not going to finish it. I will copy ...
-
Straight out I do not believe in using numerology to get super powers of tell fortunes of anything like that. I do not believe it works for...
-
Turd Flinging Monkey's Political Trichotomy 1 Freedom 2 Equality 3 Stability Not everyone shares the same values in life when it comes ...
