An ancap plutocrat can not maintain ownership of the world

Anarchism is not about abolishing government but believing States are fabrications used as tools of undue influence.  There are many voluntary systems people can agree to on a local level when it comes to so called property but the claim that individuals consented to such systems when they did not is fabricated when it comes to claims by the United States for example.  Different voluntary communities can have different systems and the freedom to disassociate with people from communities whose system they disagree with.  A rich man who everyone hates by going too far will find no one to guard his property or even if he does may find himself soon bankrupt at the increased expense of unpopularity for claiming to own the whole world and be no longer able to back up his claim with force.  More over it there is an ancom community nearby and workers are not treated well enough they may relocate and without someone to persuade through money the amassed money of an ancap can no longer persuade people to do provide work or resources in exchange for money.  This means ancap and ancom believers can co exist in separate geographic regions without a one and only rich person laying hold to ownership of everything in the whole world to the detriment of everyone else, so long as unbelief in the state among the aggregate of sentient individuals is sufficient, irregardless of preference for "communist" or "capitalist" economics among anarchists.

Copyright Carl Janssen 2018 August 29

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/6/62/Sentebele-Pilgrim-Progress.jpg/400px-Sentebele-Pilgrim-Progress.jpg

https://web.archive.org/web/20180829083234/https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sentebele-Pilgrim-Progress.jpg